Archive of Postings to AM-INFO Sorted by Thread

• Date Index

• Re: Microsoft -- remedies and IBM's 1984 EC undertaking, (continued)
  • Re: Microsoft -- remedies and IBM's 1984 EC undertaking, John Robert BEHRMAN
• Inconsistency of big business, Kendall G. Clark
  • Re: Inconsistency of big business, Christopher Pall
• Wow, Mark Hinds
  • Re: Wow, Christopher Pall
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Wow, Christopher Pall
  • Re: Wow, Erick Andrews
• Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?, mj
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?, Jordan Pollack
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?, Christopher Blizzard
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Fwd: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?, mj
• Government Standards compliance testing Labs, Chuck Swiger
• SGI Plans, Matthew Benjamin
  • PC Week, Ben Drasin
    • Re: PC Week, franklin
• In Japan: Microsoft Licensing Plan Denounced By User Group, James Love
  • Floating Licenses and other cyber-rights, Jordan Pollack
  • Microsoft Licensing Plan Denounced By User Group, John Robert BEHRMAN
  • Re: In Japan: Microsoft Licensing Plan Denounced By User Group, Kendall G. Clark
• Interesting news links, Mark Hinds
• Microsoft christmas carol (fwd), Mark Hinds
• JUDGE JACKSON UNINSTALLS IE, Charles A. Behney
  • Re: JUDGE JACKSON UNINSTALLS IE, Paul Richardson
    • Re: JUDGE JACKSON UNINSTALLS IE, mj
  • Re: JUDGE JACKSON UNINSTALLS IE, Declan McCullagh
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: JUDGE JACKSON UNINSTALLS IE, Mitch Stone
• InfoWorld Reply, Mark Hinds
  • Re: InfoWorld Reply, mj
• Re: Benchmarks and Notches, Glenn T. Livezey
  • Analogies (Was Re: Benchmarks and Notches), Chip Richards
• MS Christmas Carol (What no Grinch?), Glenn T. Livezey
• They Own the Courthouse, charles mueller
  • Re: They Own the Courthouse, mj
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: They Own the Courthouse, charles mueller
• Microsoft Christmas!, Beech Family
• Re: A Microsoft Christmas Carol, Dan Strychalski
  • Re: A Microsoft Christmas Carol, Christopher Pall
  • Universal standards?, Chip Richards
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: A Microsoft Christmas Carol, Dan Strychalski
    • RE: 11) They Own the Courthouse, Charles A. Behney
  • Re: A Microsoft Christmas Carol, Mitch Stone
    • Re: A Microsoft Christmas Carol, Jordan Pollack
• Fwd: Re: Analogies (Was Re: Benchmarks and Notches), mj
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Analogies (Was Re: Benchmarks and Notches), Chip Richards
• Total cost of ownership, cswiger
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Total cost of ownership, Mitch Stone
• AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$, claribba
  • Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$, Chip Richards
  • Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$, John N. Bryan
  • Ida Tarbell, Tod Landis
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$, Norm
• Re: Universal Standards?, Dan Strychalski
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Universal Standards?, Dan Strychalski
• They Own the Courthouse (2), charles mueller
• Building Pro-Monopoly Judges, charles mueller
  • Re: Building Pro-Monopoly Judges, Declan McCullagh
    • Re: Building Pro-Monopoly Judges, Christopher Pall
      • Re: Building Pro-Monopoly Judges, Declan McCullagh
• The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, Mark Hinds
  • Re: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, franklin
    • Re: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, Mark Hinds
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, Chuck Swiger
  • RE: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, Chuck Swiger
    • RE: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, franklin
  • RE: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits, Chuck Swiger
• [cswiger@widomaker.com: RE: The Corporation for Public Software/Natianal Endowment for the Bits], Jordan Pollack
• Re:"Partnered" with MS, Glenn T. Livezey
• Mother Jones on Microsoft and BSA, James Love
• Rueters on Common Control DLL, James Love
• Re:Total Cost of Membership (was Ownership), Glenn T. Livezey
• Re: AM-INFO digest 90, Glenn T. Livezey
• Win98/IE4.0, Mark Hinds
  • Re: Win98/IE4.0 Separate product? :-), Roberto Di Cosmo
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Win98/IE4.0, Norm
• [Fwd: Shifting from NT4 Server to Linux&Samba ...?], Mark Hinds
• Internet Explorer Home, Mark Hinds
• U.S. 'Injustice' Sold to Olin/Schaife, charles mueller
• Re: Win98/IE4.0 Separate product? :-), claribba
• The Economist, Mark Hinds
• [FWD]: my thoughts on MS and the DoJ, Beech Family
• Microsoft patent dispute, James Love
• The Latest Antimonopoly 'Swindle', charles mueller
• ZD Poll Results, claribba
• [FWD]my thoughts on MS and the DOJ, claribba
• Children's Art Project Greetings, jbehrman
• CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Mark Hinds
  • Re: CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Tod Landis
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Norm
  • Re: CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Erick Andrews
  • Re: CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Norm
  • Re: CNN - U.S. vs. Microsoft, Matt Gilbert
• "Why having all the money and all the brains won't buy the future for Microsoft..", Beech Family
• M$ and its ADCU, claribba
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: M$ and its ADCU, Norm
• All the brains?!?, Dan Strychalski
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: All the brains?!?, Mitch Stone
• Reiser's Response To Microsoft's Motion To Dismiss filed 12/23/97: now on the web., Hans Reiser
  • Re: Reiser's Response To Microsoft's Motion To Dismiss filed 12/23/97: now on the web., Scott K. McGrath
• MS objects to special master, Mark Hinds
• Bill -= 8.0e+9, Mark Hinds