[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$

To: am-info@essential.org
Subject: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$
From: claribba <claribba@jps.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 08:25:37 -0800

  For a lucid article on antitrust vs. AT&T, IBM, Standard Oil Co., and a
  couple of other cases, see today's [12-21-97] San Jose Mercury article by
  Scott Herhold & Scott Thurm "Antitrust: big no longer equals bad" at:
  
  	http://www.sjmercury.com/business/microsoft/docs/ms122197.htm
  
  No subscription is needed to read this.  It can be accessed from the
  Mercury Center page...link on the lower right side of page.
  
  Claire Macdonald

Follow-Ups:
- Ida Tarbell
  - From: Tod Landis <landis@cruzio.com>
- Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$
  - From: "John N. Bryan" <jnelson@bga.com>
- Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$
  - From: Chip Richards <chipr@tomquartz.niestu.com>

Prev by Date: Total cost of ownership
Next by Date: Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$
Prev by thread: Re: Total cost of ownership
Next by thread: Re: AT&T, IBM, SOC and M$
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread