Archive of Postings to ANTITRUST

  ANTITRUST is an unmoderated discussion list of current antitrust policy.
  It will discuss pending mergers, Department of Justice and FTC policies on
  mergers, and related public policy issues.
  

• Thread Index

• Common Control DLL and MSIE4.0 distribution
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Preferential Access to OS code
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Update: Anti-Monopoly vs. Hasbro, TRU et al
  • From: antimonopoly@juno.com (Ralph Anspach)
• November 1, 1997 - The World Waits
  • From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@doorstep.unety.net>
• High Priest, Robed Deity
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Your Microsoft Alternative to Antitrust
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Scale Economies at Microsoft?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Nader Conference?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Nader vs. Microsoft
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• The Other Side
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• 'Level Playing Field' at Justice?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• M$ Monitor: Buying Spree
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• Re: Letter to Reno
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: Letter to Reno
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Letter to Reno
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Why Bill Gates 'Should' Win
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Microsoft Conference Scholarships
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: In the Briefcases of Gates' Lawyers
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Re: In the Briefcases of Gates' Lawyers
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• How Will We Know Who Won?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Re: Why Bill Gates Will Win
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• In the Briefcases of Gates' Lawyers
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• In the Briefcases of Gates' Lawyers
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Why Bill Gates Will Win
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• mnational and antitrust
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights.... DJL's comments
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Microsoft response to Nader Conference
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Why Netscape is the real "Microsoft" bogey
  • From: "GC-Etchison, Michael" <etchison@puc.texas.gov>
• M$ Monitor: What's Next?
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• M$ Monitor: Congress Looks at MS
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• Proposal to create a map of our collective evidence of tying, issues of law
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (7)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (6)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (5)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (4)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Microsoft Conference Invite
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Consumer Sovereignty (fwd)
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• (no subject) (fwd)
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• Microsoft hearing set for Dec 5
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Senate hearings on Microsoft
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (3)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• O/S market share
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• DOJ asked to stop MS monopolization of browser market
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights (2)
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• EI only again
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: "Michael R. Ward" <ward1@ux6.cso.uiuc.edu>
• Re: DOJ actions -- Why not Windows 98?
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Monopoly on Competitors' Turf
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• Re: DOJ actions -- Why not Windows 98?
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Re: DOJ actions -- Why not Windows 98?
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• DOJ actions -- Why not Windows 98?
  • From: "HIDAKA, Kazuaki" <Chaos@infonet-dev.co.jp>
• Re: Antitrust Bill of Rights
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• Re: Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Antitrust Bill of Rights
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Japan FTC email and web addresses
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• MS letter to PC users
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: "Howard P. Knopf" <hknopf@magmacom.com>
• Re: Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Re: Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Re: Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: "HIDAKA, Kazuaki" <Chaos@infonet-dev.co.jp>
• Re: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• RE: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: "DeBrock, Larry" <ldebrock@uiuc.edu>
• Re: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• RE: Microsoft's Zone
  • From: "DeBrock, Larry" <ldebrock@uiuc.edu>
• Another example of EI4.0 only Web site
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Microsoft's Zone
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Well done MS Joke
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Another good CNET Link
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• DOJ on Microsoft Netscape envy
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Japan Microsoft Investigation
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: A question: predatory pricing
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• A question: predatory pricing
  • From: Ori Barr <r9991917@netvision.net.il>
• 1995 consent decree
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• Whether IE4 is Application Rather than OS avoids the deeper question of component competition
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Proof that IE4 is Application Rather than OS
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• 1/3d 'Concealed'?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Economics of Spam - long
  • From: "Michael R. Ward" <ward1@ux6.cso.uiuc.edu>
• IE is free. Visual Studio won't work without it
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Microsoft treatment of Netscape fonts
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re[2]: 1/3d "Concealed"?
  • From: kshugarman@gph.com (Keith D Shugarman)
• Re: 1/3d "Concealed"?
  • From: "Michael R. Ward" <ward1@ux6.cso.uiuc.edu>
• 1/3d "Concealed"?
  • From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>
• Re: M$ Monitor: Justice Finally Gets It!
  • From: "Torsten Schmidt" <torsten.schmidt@unh.edu>
• Computer Pac money, etc.
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Pro MS viewpoint
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• MS problem
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• M$ Monitor: Justice Finally Gets It!
  • From: Audrie Krause <audrie@netaction.org>
• More on MS case
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• STATEMENT BY RALPH NADER DOJ'S MICROSOFT ACTION
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• I filed suit regarding Microsoft's violating Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act
  • From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
• Re: AT&T/GTE vs. AT&T/baby Bell
  • From: Chris_Rowsell@espicom.com
• Re: Competition in Software market research project
  • From: rlande@UBmail.ubalt.edu
• Re: Competition in Software market research project
  • From: "Howard P. Knopf" <hknopf@magmacom.com>
• Competition in Software market research project
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• AT&T/GTE vs. AT&T/baby Bell
  • From: "Michael R. Ward" <ward1@ux6.cso.uiuc.edu>
• MS response to Sun Lawsuit
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• FWD: Browser Wars and Antitrust
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Ballmer on MS Antitrust disputes
  • From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
• Re: Microsoft in the broadcast spectrum
  • From: rd@cottonwood.com (Rick Dahlgren)