[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US Sen Hatch on MS
- To: Multiple recipients of list <am-info@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: US Sen Hatch on MS
- From: David Dunn <david.dunn@vc3.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 10:08:07 -0500
- Organization: VC3, Inc.
- References: <A2028F14CB0CCCA4852565450023F624.0023F66E85256545@erra.vc3.com>
- Reply-To: david.dunn@vc3.com
Gerry Britton wrote:
> From Infoworld today:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?97113.esenate.htm
>
> U.S. Senate committee to look at Microsoft's Internet influence
> [...]
> Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, [...] during an
> interview with
> the Wall Street Journal published Monday.
> "Microsoft now has the ability to virtually annihilate any
> competitive product it wants by bringing it into the next version
> of Windows," Hatch was quoted as saying. "There's evidence that
> they are aggressively seeking to extend that
> monopoly to the Internet, and policy makers have to be concerned
> about it."
The above quote from Senator Hatch seems to echo the sentiments of
many people subscribed to this list and those who initiated this
list. The prevailing view seems to be, for example, that by
incorporating
the IE browser into the OS, Microsoft is going to eventually dominate
that market and take all of the market share away from Netscape.
Unfortunately, although I completely agree that Microsoft will
dominate the desktop browser market in the near future and make
Netscape a non-entity in that market, I can't agree with the viewpoint
that this will occur because Microsoft is using unfair practices
(I'm a technologist, not a legal expert, so my definition of unfair
is based solely upon what I feel is ethically correct and not upon any
body of law. I say "unfortunately" because, while I try to stay away
from
techologically based religious fervor, I am definitely
not a big fan of Microsoft and have worked hard to stay away from their
technologies in the internet arena. I come from a UNIX background. My
company is a UNIX oriented company. We love UNIX and have been big
supporters of Netscape.)
I would like to suggest
that Microsoft is going to dominate the browser market
not because of unethical and monopolistic practices, but because
the current dominant player, Netscape, is really blowing it
(sorry, I couldn't think of a more eloquent way of making that
statement).
Here's why:
My company has been engaged for three years
developing corporate intranet applications which target the
Netscape browser (meaning, to run our intranet application, users must
use the Netscape browser). During that time period, Netscape has been
the
dominant browser in the marketplace. We have been early adoptors of
their technology innovations and our applications rely extensively upon
JavaScript (which we think is a great development tool). During this
time period, however, we have been increasingly frustrated by
the poor reliability of their products and the failure of their
products to work as advertised. The cost to us has been project
overruns resulting from attempts to work around Netscape's bugs and,
in some cases, dissatisfaction from our customers. Of course,
throughout this time period there was no viable alternative
to Netscape. IE 3.0 was much
worse, for our purposes, then Netscape. But, along comes Microsoft
IE 4.0 and Netscape Communicator 4.0. Wanting to take advantage of
both of some of the features available in the next generation of
browsers and hoping for increased reliability and speed, we start
looking at NS Communicator. What do we find? We
find that our applications are now slower than before and, in most cases
do not even run. In desparation, we try the applications on IE 4.0.
Amazingly we find that
our JavaScript apps run faster and much more reliably on IE 4.0 than
on Netscape Communicator - considering that JavaScript is a Netscape
innovation this is almost to much to believe.
Netscape was in a dominant position in browser
market. They had a very loyal following of companies like mine, ISP's,
and users. Even though MS IE is free, my customer base will
gladly stick with, and pay for, Netscape browsers if we recommend it
to them. However, given the extreme reliability problems we see
with Netscape, there is no way we can continue to recommend it
and expect to stay in business. Individuals from other companies
I've talked to relate experiences similar to ours (although my
sample size is hardly statistically valid, every company I have
communicated
with recently that develops intranet or internet related applications
has indicated that they are migrating away from Netscape technologies
for the same reasons). Sadly, this migration is also occuring on
the Web server front. We've had very bad
experiences with using Netscape LiveWire for web enabled database
applications and no such problems with Microsoft's Active Server Pages.
So, my resoning based on my company's experience, is that
it is too simplistic to assume that Microsoft
is dominating markets simply by incorporating their technologies into
their base OS offering. Sadly, in this one example they are going to
dominate because their product is truly better than the
competition's (note that I did not say their product is good: as noted
in an earlier posting there is a lot wrong with IE 4.0, but I
am forced to evaluate things relatively, not absolutely).
David
--
David Dunn | Email: david.dunn@vc3.com
VC3, Inc. | URL: http://www.vc3.com
712 Richland St. Suite F. | Phone: (803) 733-7333
Columbia, SC 29201 | Fax: (803) 733-5888