[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Microsoft vs Justice Department]]





  <Could forward this reply on to the list, please>
  
  In the case of the word processor market,
  the aggressive entry included giving away 450,000 copies
  of Word.
  
  Tod
  
  
  Luc-Etienne Brachotte wrote:
  
  > <copy of a post I just send to the Appraising Microsoft Listmembers>
  >
  >                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  >
  > Subject: Re: Microsoft vs Justice Department
  > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 11:19:20 +0100
  > From: Luc-Etienne Brachotte <Luc-Etienne.Brachotte@art.alcatel.fr>
  > To: am-info@essential.org
  > References: <199711060854.DAA15934@mail.clark.net>
  >
  > Norm wrote:
  > >
  > > On Sun, 2 Nov 1997 13:55:59 -0500 (EST), Tibor Machan wrote: (extract)
  > >
  > > > A natural monopolist of this kind [...] is no threat to freedom or to
  > > > productivity.  Anyone on this list is (largely) at liberty to compete with
  > > > Microsoft or Sears (Sears nearly went under from competition a few years
  > > > ago).
  > >
  > >
  > >      Your arguments are based on the completely *WRONG* assumption that
  > > M$ is a "natural monopoly".  Are you so naive as to believe that M$ has
  > > done nothing but develop great technology???  I'm not trying to be nasty
  > > but that's completely laughable, the only thing M$ hasn't done to garnish
  > > their current marketshare is produce a better product.
  >
  > In "Microsoft Secrets",
  >
  > page 157 : Bill Gates interview
  >
  >      "Standards increase the basic machine that you
  >       can sell into [the market] ...  I really shouldn't say
  >       this, but in some ways, in an individual product
  >       category, it leads to a natural monopoly..."
  >
  > p10 : (the books authors)
  >     "Microsoft has either created or aggressively entered every major
  >      PC software mass market with products that are at least "good enough"
  >      initially to set de facto industry standards"
  >
  > The books shows later Bill Gates position : he's not interested in selling
  > the "best" products but "good enough" products. "good enough" (only) is
  > important to him.
  >
  > p138 : Mike Maples interview
  >     "If someone thinks we're not after Lotus and after WordPerfect and after
  >      Borland, they're confused."
  >
  > On same page a very nice sentence :
  >
  >     "My job is to get a fair share of the software applications, and to me that's
  >      100 percent!"
  >
  > --
  >             .~~~.  ))
  >   (\__/)  .'     )  ))              Luc-Etienne BRACHOTTE
  >   /o o  \/     .~                           AIRIAL
  >  {o_,    \    {                         3, Rue Bellini
  >    / ,  , )    \                       PUTEAUX (France)
  >    `~  '-' \    } ))
  >   _(    (   )_.'        E-mail: Luc-Etienne.Brachotte@art.alcatel.fr
  >  '---..{____}