[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FWD: Sierra Club Urges "No" to NAFTA Fast Track
===== Original Message from DAN@SMTP {dan.seligman@sfsierra.sierraclub.org}
at 9/26/97 10:24 pm
Original Recipient(s):
To: CTAYLOR@CITIZEN (Chantell Taylor)
LWALLACH@CITIZEN (LORI WALLACH)
MDOLAN@CITIZEN (MDOLAN)
Press Advisory
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:
September 26, 1997 Daniel Seligman, (202) 675-2387
Sierra Club Urges Representatives to Oppose NAFTA Fast-Track,
Launches Media Campaign
Washington, DC...The Sierra Club has launched a paid media campaign in
targeted congressional districts urging Representatives to oppose President
Clinton's request for fast-track authority to expand the North American
Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Radio ads inform voters that this fast-track
proposal will only increase the environmental damage done by NAFTA. It
asks
citizens to call their Representatives, urging them to oppose the NAFTA
fast
track.
Initial ads will start Monday, September 29, in the districts of
Representatives Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Nancy L. Johnson (R-CT), Karen
McCarthy
(D-MO), Sue W. Kelly (R-NY), Darlene Hooley (D-OR), and Ronald J. Kind
(D-WI).
"Each of these Representatives has a strong environmental voting record,"
said Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope. "We want their constituents
to understand that the NAFTA fast track is one of the most important health
and environmental issues that Americans face today."
"The President's fast-track proposal bars labor and environmental standards
from future trade agreements. It will open more environmental and health
laws to attack as `non-tariff trade barriers.' And it asks Congress to
give
up its right to amend trade agreements before it has seen the final
product,"
Pope said. "Legislators won't have any leverage to influence trade
agreements that profoundly affect their constituents."
The environmental community has united in opposition to a fast-track
proposal
that would allow new trade agreements without guarantees to protect the
environment. Labor groups also oppose the NAFTA fast-track because
unbalanced trade agreements shuffle high-paying American jobs to other
countries where workers' rights aren't protected.
"This fast track reflects the outdated notion that only corporate interests
matter as we write the rules for the global economy," added Daniel
Seligman,
Senior Fellow, who directs the Sierra Club's Responsible Trade Campaign.
"The President's proposal gives corporate polluters an inside track to
attack
our health and environmental laws. We need a different approach that
brings
all Americans to the table."
"Trade negotiations should fix the failed NAFTA, not expand a flawed
agreement," added Pope. "NAFTA weakened inspections for food imports. It
did little to clean up the US-Mexico border. Corporations are now using
NAFTA to sue taxpayers for compensation if governments try to tighten
pollution laws. Three-quarters of Americans would support an
environmentally
responsible trade policy. But the President's fast-track proposal fails to
address their concerns."
# # #
===== Comments by MDOLAN@CITIZEN (MDOLAN) at 9/27/97 12:43 pm
****************************************************************************
/s/ Mike Dolan, Field Director, Global Trade Watch, Public Citizen
Join the Global Trade Watch list server. We will keep you up to date on
trade policy and politics. To subscribe, send this message: "SUBSCRIBE
TW-LIST" [followed by your name, your organizational affiliation and the
state in which you live] to LISTPROC@ESSENTIAL.ORG
Then check out our web-site ---> www.citizen.org/pctrade
WE EDUCATE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ORGANIZE THEM.
WE DON'T ORGANIZE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO EDUCATE THEM.
Fred Ross, Sr.