[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
House favors US laws in WTO disputes
Journal of Commerce
Monday, September 29, 1997
House favors US laws in WTO
disputes
BY TIM SHORROCK
JOURNAL OF COMMERCE STAFF
WASHINGTON -- Opponents of President Clinton's free trade policies won a
victory last week when the House voted to shield U.S. federal and local laws
from
being threatened by the World Trade Organization.
The 356-64 vote occurred late Thursday on a spending bill amendment
sponsored
by Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and supported by an unusual left-right
coalition of
Democrats and Republicans.
"If I was a proponent of fast track, I would not be happy with the vote I
saw
yesterday," Mr. Sanders said at a press briefing Friday. He said the support
for his
amendment shows there is strong opposition to President Clinton's request
for new
trade negotiating authority, which will be considered by Congress on a fast
track
without amendments.
The Sanders amendment will provide $1 million to the U.S. Trade
Representative's
office to report to Congress and local and state governments every time a
foreign
government initiates an action in the WTO that could force the repeal or
modification of U.S. laws.
It reflects congressional and public anger at recent attempts by foreign
governments
to challenge local laws, such as a Massachusetts ordinance denying state
contracts
to companies that invest in the military dictatorship of Myanmar, formerly
known as
Burma.
In addition, under the WTO, Venezuela has challenged provisions in the Clean
Air
Act, Mexico has objected to U.S. laws protecting dolphins and Malaysia and
Indonesia have complained about U.S. environmental restrictions on shrimp
imports.
"This amendment is a right to know for the American people," said Rep. Bob
Ney,
R-Ohio. "It is good public policy that has overwhelming support."
"People voting on this are saying there is no compelling reason to give away
our
national sovereignty in the name of global trade," said Rep. Dennis
Kucinich,
D-Ohio. "Last night, the WTO got a vote of no-confidence." Mr. Sanders said
state
and local laws were a key factor in influencing U.S. corporations to pull
out of
South Africa during the period of apartheid. "To lose that right would be
absolutely
unacceptable," he said.
The amendment also requires the USTR to inform Congress and appropriate
local
governments when it enters new negotiations that could force changes in U.S.
laws.
===== Comments by MDOLAN@CITIZEN (MDOLAN) at 9/26/97 6:03 pm
What a tremendous victory! Kudos to Bernie Sanders. It doesn't get much
better than that.
The trade activist networks -- particularly the Free Burma campaign -- are
to be commended
as well. Word here in DC is that the Commerce Dept folk who cover Hill
happenings were
simply blown away by this unexpected and lopsided vote and scurried back to
the White
House to figure out what happened.
As noted above, this does NOT augur well for the President's "fast track"
proposal to
expand NAFTA and get into all sorts of other so-called "free trade"
mischief.
We think it would be perfectly appropriate for YOU to call your
Representative on Monday
at 1-800-765-4440 (the Capitol switchboard) and congratulate him/her for
voting in the
interest of the peoples' right to know and the integrity of our laws and
ordinances and, indeed,
of our democratic decision-making. Unless they're among the 64 No votes, of
course.
****************************************************************************
/s/ Mike Dolan, Field Director, Global Trade Watch, Public Citizen
Join the Global Trade Watch list server. We will keep you up to date on
trade policy and politics. To subscribe, send this message: "SUBSCRIBE
TW-LIST" [followed by your name, your organizational affiliation and the
state in which you live] to LISTPROC@ESSENTIAL.ORG
Then check out our web-site ---> www.citizen.org/pctrade
WE EDUCATE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ORGANIZE THEM.
WE DON'T ORGANIZE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO EDUCATE THEM.
Fred Ross, Sr.