[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
isdn action lists,,, suggestions
- To: isdn@tap.org
- Subject: isdn action lists,,, suggestions
- From: James Love <love@tap.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 15:11:56 -0500 (EST)
We are having requests to help people set up more localized action lists
for discussions of problems with particular state tariffs....
When possible, we prefer to defer to local lists set up by others, such
as the Utah and CA-PacBell lists (which are mentioned in the state by
state updates on the CPT Web page). However, it may be useful for us to
do a bit more for some states. On way would be just setting up new lists
for every state where these is an interest... another approach would be
to set up a list for each providers, such as ISDN-BA, ISDN-USW,
ISDN-GTE... etc...... I kinda like the provider model, since the tariff
actions in each state are highly relevant to each other. Finally, we
might just forget the splinter lists, and only keep isdn up, allow people
to set their own special lists as they see fit. Suggestions are welcome
on this. I am motivated somewhat by persons from Virginia who want more
attention to their problems... jamie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Love, love@tap.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
Consumer Project on Technology; http://www.essential.org/cpt/cpt.html
Taxpayer Assets Project; http://www.essential.org/tap/tap.html