[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: USGS asks pub;ic's help in ID malformed amphibians
>Hi. I seem to be blocked as far as the dioxin-l list is concerned and
>thought you might be interested in sharing this method of getting the SEC
>to work. Thanks, Elizabeth O'Nan
>
>Our organization was able to trigger an investigation into Waste Management
>Inc. by filing a stock holder complaint. It didn't seem to matter that our
>stock holder held only one share of stock...but the fact that the complaint
>was filed by a stock holder seemed to be the irrefutable issue. It may
>save time and legal expense to buy one share of stock from each of the
>suspect companies and file a shareholder complaint. Shareholders seem to
>have greater standing in these issues. If several stock holders files
>complaints that might trigger more help. Check their rules. Just a guess.
>E.M.T. O'Nan
>
>----------
>> From: Tony Tweedale <ttweed@wildrockies.org>
>> To: Multiple recipients of list <dioxin-l@essential.org>
>> Subject: Re: The SEC's Dirty Secret (ENS)
>> Date: Thursday, August 21, 1997 9:28 AM
>>
>> >The SEC's Dirty
>> >Secret
>> >
>> >Posted to the web: Fri Aug 15 19:27:42 EDT 1997
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >By Donald Sutherland
>> >
>> >WASHINGTON, DC, August 15, 1997 (ENS) -
>> >Information on the environmental liabilities of
>> >corporations is being withheld from investors
>> >and from the general public, but little is being
>> >done to bring light into these dark corners.
>> >
>> >In February of 1997, three environmental