[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SEC's Dirty Secret (ENS)
- To: hope@selway.umt.edu, bryony@wildrockies.org, gutsche@wildrockies.org, montpirg@selway.umt.edu, evst@selway.umt.edu, lbroberg@selway.umt.edu, txtrky@selway.umt.edu, billysun@wildrockies.org, meic@desktop.org, Citizens@netrix.net, seek251@aol.com, parker@wildrockies.org, tlange@nprc.desktop.org, chlorina@marsweb.com, kagan@wildrockies.org, annies@selway.umt.edu, elynch@wildrockies.org, nox2228@montana.com, CMCR@wildrockies.org, wds@midrivers.com, CONS-EQ-HORMONE-MIMICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG, dioxin-l@essential.org, endohealth@onenw.org, pulppaper@onenw.org, Thcz@aol.com, PaulRichrd@aol.com, rpojasek@sprynet.com, cfpa1@ibm.net
- Subject: Re: The SEC's Dirty Secret (ENS)
- From: ttweed@wildrockies.org (Tony Tweedale)
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 07:37:14 -0600
>The SEC's Dirty
>Secret
>
>Posted to the web: Fri Aug 15 19:27:42 EDT 1997
>
>
>
>By Donald Sutherland
>
>WASHINGTON, DC, August 15, 1997 (ENS) -
>Information on the environmental liabilities of
>corporations is being withheld from investors
>and from the general public, but little is being
>done to bring light into these dark corners.
>
>In February of 1997, three environmental
>groups - Friends of the Earth, Citizen Action,
>and the Sierra Club - sent a letter to the U.S.
>Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
>asking for an investigation of the
>entertainment giant Viacom Inc. The groups
>want the SEC, a federal government agency, to
>look into why Viacom failed to disclose over
>$300 million in Superfund liabilities at more
>than 30 sites in the firm's 1995 SEC 10-K form
>to stakeholders.
>
>Susan Duffy, a spokeswoman for Viacom, told
>the Wall Street Journal in March that the
>environmental groups grossly exaggerated
>Viacom's Superfund liabilities, but she
>declined to give the actual accrued value of the
>company's liabilities.
>
>Viacom assumed the superfund liabilities of
>Gulf & Western, which changed its name to
>Paramount Communications in 1989, and was
>acquired by Viacom in 1994.
>
>To date, the SEC has yet to repond to the
>request by the three environmental groups.
>
>Financial researchers in the field of
>environmental 10-K disclosure point out that
>the Viacom case is by no means unique in the
>U.S. stock market.
>
>"Only once in the last twenty years has the SEC
>enforced environmental GAAP in 10-K filing,"
>said Martin Freedman, professor at the School
>of Management at Binghamton University in
>New York.
>
>GAAP stands for Generally Accepted
>Accounting Principles. While it is the SEC's
>responsibility to enforce the GAAP, the
>American Institute of Certified Public
>Accountants (AICPA) and the Financial
>Accounting Standards Board (FASB) are the
>not-for-profit, membership organizations
>which write the standards for accounting
>models in the United States.
>
>The GAAP arrangement is a government-private
>partnership that is unique in the world. Most
>governments control standards; but in the U.S.
>the function is supposed to be covered by a
>government-private partnership.
>
>Martin Freedman and A.J. Stagliano, of the
>College of Business and Administration at
>Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia, Pa, in
>a 1996 report, randomly chose 26 firms from
>the Environmental Protection Agency's list of
>900 publicly traded potentially responsible
>parties (PRPs) listed on the 1993 National
>Priority List. The report found only 12 made
>any sort of environmental expense/liability or
>legal matter disclosure.
>
>Freedman says his findings support previous
>research studies which state that despite the
>legal obligation to provide qualitative and
>quantitative assessment of a firm's estimated
>hazardous waste liabilities to stakeholders
>many firms make "little or no disclosure
>effort."
>
>The National Environmental Policy Act of 1970,
>the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
>Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
>(CERCLA), and the Superfund Amendments and
>Reauthorization Act of 1986 have had a major
>impact on businesses identified as PRPs.
>
>The clean up of hazardous waste sites
>mandated under these laws is estimated in the
>hundreds of billions of dollars nationwide. But,
>most potentially responsible parties have put
>off paying the clean up costs with court
>litigation that disputes the EPA's
>determinations.
>
>But potentially responsibly parties who try to
>defer costs by filing lawsuits are potentially
>barking up the wrong tree. The national
>environmental accounting requirements under
>GAAP, and the SEC's Regulation S-K require
>disclosure of environmental liabilities -
>whether or not they are contingent on a final
>agreement with the EPA.
>
>"The 1975 Statement of Financial Accounting
>Standards No.5 stated you record a liability
>when it's probable and the amount is estimable,
>but many companies choose not to estimate,"
>said Fred Gill, Senior Technical Manager of
>AICPA.
>
>"The new environmental accounting model for
>environmental remediation liability Statement
>of Position 96-1 now requires corporations to
>disclose what they can estimate," said Gill.
>
>The laws and regulations are in place - the
>catch is enforcement.
>
>Legal experts do not expect the SEC to rule on
>the Viacom situation anytime soon because of
>the unwritten detente that exists between the
>publicly traded companies and the SEC in filing
>environmental capital and liability costs.
>
>"How can the SEC prove Viacom departed from
>GAAP when they have allowed mixed practice
>in environmental 10-K filing to exist for so
>long?" asked Greg Newington, Chief of
>Enforcement for the California State Board of
>Accountancy.
>
>"They (the SEC authorities) don't want to end up
>like Marcia Clarke and lose a high profile court
>challenge to a powerfully financed company
>like Viacom," Newington said.
>
>The Corporation of Finance at the SEC has
>refused to cite previous enforcement cases of
>environmental 10-K filings. The agency admits
>to a policy of confidentiality for corporate
>internal environmental audits.
>
>"Disclosure of internal environmental audits is
>neither prohibited nor mandated by the
>Commission's rules or staff policies, and the
>staff believes that disclosures meeting the
>requirements of the securities laws need not
>include internal environmental audits," said
>William E. Morley, Senior Associate Director of
>the Corporation of Finance.
>
>"Without enforcement of internal
>environmental audits to stakeholders, anything
>goes in 10-K filing of significant
>environmental material expenses," said
>Freedman.
>
>The SEC declined to comment on whether their
>policy of confidentiality for corporate internal
>environmental audits is a breach of federal
>disclosure laws and the Security Exchange Acts
>which require full disclosure of corporate
>assets and liabilities to stakeholders.
>
>The environmental groups are not giving up on
>their pursuit of the issue of disclosure of
>corporate environmental liabilities. "We plan to
>follow up our charges on Viacom with the SEC
>in September," said Michele Chan-Fishel of
>Friends of the Earth, "and this is not the only
>company we will be targeting for failure to
>report environmental liabilities."
>
>
> The Environment News
> Service is exclusively
> hosted by
> the EnviroLink Network.
> Copyright © 1997 ENS,
>Inc.