[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCBs burned in the South make their way up to the Great
- To: <dioxin-l@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: PCBs burned in the South make their way up to the Great
- From: "Jon Campbell" <jon@cqs.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 15:27:03 -0400
These figures are all very nice, but not very
meaningful. It is well known that
the dump stack, which prevents rotary kiln incinerators
from exploding when
there is too much internal pressure, is UNMONITORED
and gets
used FREQUENTLY during real burns of hazwaste.
Note the case of Jacksonville, AR, in which a
hazwaste
incinerator
increased (measurably) the dioxin in people's blood
in
the area
by 22%. The combustion efficiency of this incinerator,
it was proven
by Pat Costner of Greenpeace, actually had a burn
efficiency of
99.96 percent, increasing amount of dioxins, etc. by
a
factor
of 400.
The EPA admitted in court that they COULD NOT PRODUCE
TECHNICAL DATA
TO PROVE THAT ANY HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR HAD A
DESTRUCTIVE EFFICIENCY OF 99.9999%. On the basis of
this admission,
the Jacksonville incinerator was shut by court order.
One of the major reasons they cannot produce that
data
is because of
the dump stack...
Hazwaste incineration is a BAD IDEA and anyone living
near one
or who might have one moving in should seriously
consider
opposing and closing it.
Jon
----
From: asagady@sojourn.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <dioxin-l@essential.org
>
Date: Friday, August 01, 1997 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: PCBs burned in the South make their way
up to the Great
>>Burning 500 million pounds at 99.9999% destruction
removal equivalence
>>(DRE) may release 5,000 pounds of PCBs if the
dielectric fluid is one
>>million parts per million; 3,750 pounds of PCBs
released at 750,000 ppm,
>>and 2,500 pounds PCBs at 500,000 ppm PCBs.
Dielectric fluids range from
>>50% - 100% pure PCBs (or 500,000 - 1,000,000 ppm).
We do not need any
>>more PCBs in the air, water, food chain or
ecosystems. Incineration will
>>certainly release PCBs since it ain't perfect, and
the potential is for
>>far more PCBs to be released than this conservative
calculation.
>>99.99999% is based upon a Trial Burn using a
surrogate chlorinated
>>compound-NOT PCBs-and this is pie in the sky as far
as incineration
>>goes.
>>
The math is off in this statement concerning PCB
waste
burning theoretical
calculations
circulated on dioxin-l from a Houston web site
Why would burning PCB waste with 1 PPM PCB release at
99.9999%
theoretical DRE release more PCB than burning the
same
amount of PCB waste
at the same DRE if the waste had 750,000 ppm or
500,000 ppm PCBs
for theoretical undestroyed PCBs?
500,000,000 pounds = 5 E8 pounds of waste
99.9999% DRE is equivolent to 0.0001% PCB undestroyed/
released
0.0001% PCB undestroy/released = 1 E-6 proportion of
PCB release during burning
1 ppm PCB content = 1E-6 proportion of PCB in a waste
which is 1 PPM PCB
Therefore, for your 1 PPM PCB waste:
In 500,000,000 pounds of 1 PPM PCB waste
there is 5 E8 * 1 E-6 total PCBs
or 500 pounds of PCBs in the waste to be burned.
If these 500 pounds of PCBs are burned with a DRE of
99.9999% then after
incineration there is 5 E 2 * 1 E-6 or 5 E -4
undestroyed or
0.0005 pounds of PCB emitted/undestroyed at 99.9999%
theoretical DRE
For your 500,000 ppm PCB waste:
In 500,000,000 pounds of 500,000 ppm PCB waste
there is 5 E8 * 5 E 5 * 1 E-6 total PCBs
or 25 E7 pounds or 250,000,000 pounds of PCB
If these 250,000,000 pounds of PCB are burned with a
DRE of 99.9999% then
after incineration there is 2.5 E7 * 1 E-6 or
2.5
E 1 or
25 pounds of PCBs emitted/undestroyed at 99.9999% DRE
The above are theoretical emission rates and do not
deal
with PICs, PCDD/F, HCL, etc.
Neil Carman's point about fugitive emissions is a
good
one.
-------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
Alex J. Sagady & Associates Email: asagady@sojo
urn.com
Environmental Consulting and Database Systems
PO Box 39 East Lansing, MI 48826-0039
(517) 332-6971 (voice); (517) 332-8987 (fax)