[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More or Less Dioxin???
Sam Wrote:
>If you have a problem with specific
>pieces of research or those scientists, then point to the specific
>research, the page number, and provide references. Don't denigrate an
>entire population of scientists with such an offhand and casual remark
So presumably we can now expect you apply these standards to what looked
suspiciously like 'an offhand and casual remark' from you about the
Greenpeace "Dioxin Factories Expose,"`? (And this really must extend to
more than a request for the field notes)
There is no point in us being bashful about the debate - if there are
errors then there is little doubt that the CCC and others will make great
play of them. Surely better that we can thrash them out in this forum -
which is a more realistic peer review than most academic journals in any
case.
Best wishes
Alan
........................................................
_\\|//_ Alan Watson C.Eng
(' O^O ') Oakleigh
==|=ooO=(_)=Ooo=|== Wernffrwd
! ! Gower
! PUBLIC ! Swansea SA4 3TY
! INTEREST ! UK
! CONSULTANTS ! Tel: 01792 851599
! ! Fax: 01792 850056
! ! Check out:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/
For UK issues and information
........................................................