[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More or Less Dioxin???



  
  Sam Wrote:
  
  >If you have a problem with specific
  >pieces of research or those scientists, then point to the specific
  >research, the page number, and provide references.  Don't denigrate an
  >entire population of scientists with such an offhand and casual remark
  
  So presumably we can now expect you apply these standards to what looked 
  suspiciously like 'an offhand and casual remark' from you about the 
  Greenpeace "Dioxin Factories Expose,"`?  (And this really must extend to 
  more than a request for the field notes)
  
  There is no point in us being bashful about the debate - if there are 
  errors then there is little doubt that the CCC and others will make great 
  play of them.  Surely better that we can thrash them out in this forum - 
  which is  a more realistic peer review than most academic journals in any 
  case.
  
  Best wishes
  
  Alan
  
  ........................................................
         _\\|//_                Alan Watson C.Eng                  
        (' O^O ')               Oakleigh                      
   ==|=ooO=(_)=Ooo=|==          Wernffrwd                            
     !             !            Gower                                 
     !   PUBLIC    !            Swansea   SA4 3TY                 
     !  INTEREST   !            UK                                    
     ! CONSULTANTS !            Tel: 01792 851599                   
     !             !            Fax: 01792 850056                     
     !             !   Check out:                           
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/            
                       For UK issues and information                
  ........................................................