[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Nuclear Waste Legislation Alert
******* CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT *******
Nuclear Waste Legislation Making a Comeback?
The end of 1996 is quickly approaching and now we must look ahead
to the 105th Congress. The defeat of the Nuclear Waste Act of
1996 was a great victory, but potentially a short-lived one with
a more conservative Senate. The nuclear industry is gathering
steam to force the nuclear waste issue into Congress's hands and
derail health, safety, and environmental safeguards.
S. 1936, and its counterpart H.R. 1020, would have made for a
disastrous law because they would have authorized interim storage
at the Nevada Test Site, thereby placing additional political
pressure on making Yucca Mountain the permanent repository for
high level nuclear waste. In addition, the bills would have
forced transportation of nuclear waste across 43 states and would
have raised the repository radiation exposure level to 100
millrem/yr, which the International Council on Radiological
Protection associates with one excess cancer death for every 286
individuals exposed over a lifetime.
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich recently said that passage of
nuclear waste legislation would be one of his top priorities in
the new Congress. Congressional staff confirm that the nuclear
industry hopes to introduce a bill early in 1997 and quickly push
it through the committee and onto the floor for a vote. We
expect the new industry backed bill to be at least as bad as the
previous bills in the 104th Congress.
The election outcome sets up another Senate battle. 33 votes
against S. 1936 remain in the Senate while 15 freshmen will take
office. Efforts to communicate with the Senators-elect are under
way. Remember that we only need 34 votes to sustain the veto.
And finally, the President has given no indication of changing
his veto threat. Yet, the nuclear utilities are putting pressure
on him and we need to counter this pressure.
The following 33 Senators who voted against S. 1936 should be
contacted by letter and asked for their support again in the
future to protect health, safety, and environmental safeguards.
AR Dale Bumpers D
CA Dianne Feinstein D
CA Barbara Boxer D
CO Ben Campbell R
CT Christopher Dodd D
CT Joseph Lieberman D
DE Joseph Biden D
HI Daniel Inouye D
HI Daniel Akaka D
IN Dan Coats R
KY Wendell Ford D
LA John Breaux D
MA Edward Kennedy D
MA John Kerry D
MD Paul Sarbanes D
MD Barbara Mikulski D
MN Paul Wellstone D
MT Max Baucus D
ND Kent Conrad D
ND Byron Dorgan D
NE Bob Kerrey D
NJ Frank Lautenberg D
NM Jeff Bingaman D
NV Harry Reid D
NV Richard Bryan D
NY Daniel Moynihan D
OH John Glenn D
OR Ron Wyden D
RI John Chafee R
SD Thomas Daschle D
WI Russell Feingold D
WV Robert Byrd D
WV John Rockefeller D
The following Senators-Elect should be contacted by letter and
asked for their support against industry backed bills that
curtail health, safety, and environmental safeguards
AR Tim Hutchinson D
CO Wayne Allard R
GA Max Cleland D
IL Richard Durbin D
KS Sam Brownback R
KS Pat Roberts R
LA Mary Landrieu D
ME Susan Collins R
NE Chuck Hagel D
NJ Robert Torricelli D
OR Gordon Smith R
RI Jack Reed D
SD Tim Johnson R
WY Mike Enzi R
AL Jeff Sessions D
The address for the Senators and Senators-elect:
The Honorable ______
United States Senate
Washington, DC, 20510
Dear Senator-elect ____
For more information on nuclear waste issues please refer to our
web site at:
http://www.citizen.org/CMEP/
_____________________________________________________________________________
To receive regular alerts on energy policy through the Internet, sign up for
the Critical Mass listserver by sending the following message to:
listproc@essential.org
SUBSCRIBE CMEP-LIST Your Name - Organization (no acronyms) - Home state
The Critical Mass Energy Project world wide web site is located at:
http://www.citizen.org/CMEP
The Critical Mass email address is cmep@essential.org