[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Part of the Microsoft Agreement



  In reply to David E. Y. Sarna's message sent 12/7/97 9:09 PM:
  
  >We definitely ought to execute them by firing squad for posting this
  >warning.
  
  I think you are missing the point. 
  
  Or maybe not. Perhaps you believe that Microsoft products _are_ suitable 
  for "the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or 
  communication systems, air traffic control, direct life support machines, 
  or weapons systems"? Surely not...
  
  So does Microsoft provide these same caveats for ActiveX, for one? Any 
  others? If not, what exactly is the point of this "warning?"
  
     Mitch Stone
  +---
     At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1b3.
  
     Boycott Microsoft ** http://www.vcnet.com/bms