[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nader Conference?

To: cmueller@metrolink.net
Subject: Re: Nader Conference?
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 18:56:31 -0500
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <am-info@essential.org>
In-Reply-To: <19971114233255343.AAA152@psl2019.metrolink.net>

  Yep. Yesterday's panels were achingly boring. High point was the critic's
  noon summit (that Ralph tried to lure reporters away from by having media
  availability at the same time).

  Today was better. Best part of today and the whole conf was the Media &
  Microsoft panel. Barlow got up and said free market should rein in MSFT
  without whining to the Feds. Jlists detailed their horror stories of Big
  Bad Bill pressuring editors, threatening publishers.

  -Declan

  At 18:33 -0500 11/14/97, charles mueller wrote:
  >        Did the Nader conference on Microsoft actually take place today?
  >I've been unable to find any helpful clues in today's posts.
  >
  >        Charles Mueller, Editor
  >        ANTITRUST LAW & ECONOMICS REVIEW
  >        http://webpages.metrolink.net/~cmueller

Follow-Ups:
- Summary of Conference available? (Was: Re: Nader Conference?)
  - From: "Kendall G. Clark" <kclark@computek.net>

References:
- Nader Conference?
  - From: charles mueller <cmueller@metrolink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Brave New World
Next by Date: Re: FW: The term "operating system"
Prev by thread: Nader Conference?
Next by thread: Summary of Conference available? (Was: Re: Nader Conference?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread