[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft vs. Justice Department
** Reply to note from machan@chapman.edu Sun, 2 Nov 1997 13:54:10 -0500 (EST)
> Sounds like a lot of folks here just do not like it that they didn't get in the game early
> enough and had the support from the public as those who did. Now I am not an expert on all
> the details but even reading through the complaints all I can detect is disgruntlement at
> -- not any bona fide cheating, deception, coercion, etc., on the part of -- Microsoft.
> Court cases do not count in my book because the law is completely corrupt as far as
> dealing with market competition is concerned. People are convicted of loan sharking, for
> example, and that is no real crime at all since it means no more than charging high
> interest in a risky venture. People are convicted of prostitution, which also is no real
> crime. Anti-trust rulings, in general, have nothing to do with real crimes but with belly
> aching that politicians and their appointees cater to.
Oooo boy! We got a winner here folks! (oh yes, speaking for myself only)
--
Ed
--
Team OS/2
MoonWolf Enterprises
Edward R. Mortimer moonwolf@earthling.net
The Land of Beyond http://www.trailerpark.com/moonwalk/moonwolf/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------