[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Return Economics html trivial debate

To: jbehrman@netropolis.net
Subject: Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:23:30 -0800
CC: Multiple recipients of list <am-info@essential.org>
References: <34590651.B91A5A48@netropolis.net>

  All you folks who hate HTML email need to get used to the notion that technology has moved on.  Sorry.  I miss reading
  my mail in emacs too.
  
  That said, I think the polite thing is to set your browser to send in both HTML and plain text (bytes are cheap, even
  on a modem, when images are not present).
  
  I should also note that for some peculiar reason my Communicator 4.03 failed to handle the HTML from Behrman, and I had
  to read past the markup.
  
  Hans

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
  - From: Greg F Walz Chojnacki <gwc@csd.uwm.edu>
- Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
  - From: John Robert BEHRMAN <jbehrman@netropolis.net>
- Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
  - From: "Kendall G. Clark" <kclark@computek.net>

References:
- Return Economics
  - From: John Robert BEHRMAN <jbehrman@netropolis.net>

Prev by Date: I filed a private lawsuit with Microsoft over non-contractual tying by control of the interface.
Next by Date: Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
Prev by thread: I filed a private lawsuit with Microsoft over non-contractual tying by control of the interface.
Next by thread: Re: Return Economics html trivial debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread