[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jan. 31 message

To: WOODWARD@BINAH.CC.BRANDEIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Jan. 31 message
From: James Love <love@tap.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 08:37:49 -0500 (EST)
cc: Multiple recipients of list <med-privacy@essential.org>
In-Reply-To: <01I0SY57DIK28XH4MJ@BINAH.CC.BRANDEIS.EDU>

  Yes, but I wasn't sure what I was supposed to do.  I could forward it to 
  the list, but under whose name?  I haven't had time to investigate it or 
  form my own opinion yet.  Can you just post your views directly to the 
  list?  (the address is med-privacy@tap.org).  jamie

  On Sun, 4 Feb 1996 WOODWARD@BINAH.CC.BRANDEIS.EDU wrote:

  > Jamie,  I sent a message addressed <in%"love@essential.org"> on
  > 31 January.  Did you get it?  Beverly
  > 

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  James Love, love@tap.org
  P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
  Consumer Project on Technology; http://www.essential.org/cpt/cpt.html
  Taxpayer Assets Project; http://www.essential.org/tap/tap.html

References:
- Jan. 31 message
  - From: WOODWARD@BINAH.CC.BRANDEIS.EDU

Prev by Date: Jan. 31 message
Next by Date: Re: Feb 2 AHIMA meeting on S. 1360
Prev by thread: Jan. 31 message
Next by thread: Doe v. Septa
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread