[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISP phone ratio's and Interoffice trunkage for voice
With data calls (including ISDN) from residential consumers there seem to
be two sides to the pricing thing. 1st, what does it cost for the
residential consumer to call, and 2nd, what does it cost for the ISP to
recieve the call.
1. If the RBOCs are built out so that more than 1 of 8 residential
consumers can be connected at one time, and the ISP's are built out so
that they can connect less than 1 of 8 residential consumers, the calls to
ISP's don't cause (can't cause) a burden from the residential end. Right?
2. However, on the ISP end, they are using their lines much more
densely. But they pay business rates, which are higher, and indeed, over
the company's incremental costs, probably even when used densely. Since
the ISP business is new, and for right now adds to total traffic
(internet telephone is mostly a toy at this point), interoffice trunkage
is way cheaper than it was 5 years ago..., where's the harm?
3. Moreover, since the RBOCs seem to think that residential second lines
are very profitable (how else do you explain the promotions for
residential second lines), and a high percentage of modem calls are made
from second lines, it is not unreasonable to think that the ISP is
contributing to demand for products which are making positive
contributions to the joint costs, from the residential end.
4. The RBOCs now see themselves as competitors to the independent ISP's,
and want to raise their costs as much as they can. When the RBOC owned
ISP pays for its phones, it's just moving money from one pocket to another.
On Fri, 12 Jul 1996, Marty Tennant wrote:
> What if the business has an automatic call distributor and lots of agents
> answering voice calls from local exchange users? This would create a
> high holding time situation, on the trunks and on interoffice trunks.
> Does the LEC come begging for relief? No, but they do get the pbx trunk
> rate, typically twice the single line business customer rate. These
> rates help pay for the increased network impact.
> Do ISP's pay these rates? I don't know.
> These higher rates have subsidized universal service for many years, and
> shown LEC's great profit margins.
> Is this the problem or is it part of the continuing solution for
> universal service funding?
> Marty Tennant
> Please share more with the group on this. I know that this is an issue
> Hundt is looking at.
> Marty Tennant
James Love / email@example.com / P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036
Voice: 202/387-8030; Fax 202/234-5176
Center for Study of Responsive Law
Consumer Project on Technology; http://www.essential.org/cpt
Taxpayer Assets Project; http://www.tap.org