[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
good overview of env. fate of pcdd/f
- To: CONS-EQ-HORMONE-MIMICS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG, dioxin-l@essential.org, endohealth@onenw.org, hope@selway.umt.edu, bryony@wildrockies.org, gutsche@wildrockies.org, montpirg@selway.umt.edu, evst@selway.umt.edu, lbroberg@selway.umt.edu, txtrky@selway.umt.edu, billysun@wildrockies.org, meic@desktop.org, Citizens@netrix.net, seek251@aol.com, parker@wildrockies.org, tlange@nprc.desktop.org, chlorina@marsweb.com, kagan@wildrockies.org, annies@selway.umt.edu, elynch@wildrockies.org, nox2228@montana.com, CMCR@wildrockies.org, wds@midrivers.com
- Subject: good overview of env. fate of pcdd/f
- From: ttweed@wildrockies.org (Tony Tweedale)
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:53:27 -0600
Michael McLachlan (U. Bayreuth, Germany) 'A simple model to predict
accumulation of pcdd/f's in an agricultural food chain' _chemosophere_
34:5-7:1263-76 ('97)
is actually, in its 1st half, a brief but packed summary of the literature
on deposition, uptake & metabolism. among the interesting facts:
* root/uptake/translocation does not seem to be the major pathway to
plants, as once thought [except for the cucurbita family--squash, cukes &
melons)!].
* cow uptake direct from soil depends a lot on the harvesting method for
their feed [if self-employed (free-range), cows are efficient at ingesting
more plant than soil!].
* Cl4dd/f apparantly partition to gas phase in atmosphere, Cl8dd/f to
particles. this is followed by: "The importance of dry gaseous deposition
was supported by field studies which showed that the relative contribution
of the lower chlorinated congeners to the pcdd/f levels was much higher in
plants than in atmospheric particles [5, 24]. While it is possible that
particle bound deposition plays a more important role for the lower
chlorinated congeners at locations close to sources where there are very
high levels of atmospheric particles, dry gaseous deposition would appear
to be the dominnat mechanism for the lower chlorinated pcdd/f in rural
areas where the bulk of agricultural productioin occurs." it is unclear
to me if he saying the Cl4dd/f congeners *preferentially deposit*, based on
observation of their higher levels in plants than in atmospheric particles.
*gaseous uptake is described by a simple linear model, plants w/ large
surface areas doing the most.
* "Only 2,3,7,8 substituted pcdd/f are usually found in cattle...other[s]
are usually metabolized [28, 31]." maybe he meant excreted, as such has
been said for humans, that the flatter 2,3,7,8 congeners get through the
gut easier.
* dairy cattle are close to a steady state. beef cattle store, "However
the growth rate..is so large that there is extensive growth dilution of
pcdd/f {concentrations, presumably]...are generally not much higher than
the [C] measured in milk fat."
* in the modeling section (his model agrees well with his observed
concentrations), fig. 3 & 4 show that 2,3,7,8-tcdd is ~ 11% of ocdd and
~4% of total pcdd, in milk. i assume this is elevated over typical env.
levels? roughly the same proportion is shown for furans, and for dioxins
and furans in beef. if there were typical environmental levels to compare
to, and the concentrations were expressed in TEQ, it would become apparent.
tony tweedale