[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fish and Egg Producers Must Follow FDA Dioxin Testing Directive
Following are excerpts from today's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette lead
story on the dioxin in chicken and fish. It addresses some of the
questions asked about yesterday's article.
Chaney, D., Plunkett, C. Fish industry not off dioxin-test hook.
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, July 16, 1997
Hundreds of Arkansas catfish farmers may be ordered by a federal
agency to test fish for dioxin. The farmers said that could decimate
the $52.2 million-a-year industry and plunge many farms into
bankruptcy.
Industry officials last week understood they would be exempt
indefinitely from increased federal scrutiny of dioxin levels in
processed meat and fish. But Tuesday, officials at the Food and Drug
Administration said the farmers will likely be required to onduct
expensive tests to prove that the edible meat in their fish contains
dioxin in levels of less than 1 part per trillion.
Dioxin is a suspected carcinogen.
A similar directive, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
Food Safety and Inspection Service, took effect at midnight Sunday
and kept at least 2,000 poultry workers off the job Monday. About
1,300 returned to work Tuesday.
Effective at midnight today, egg producers also have to meet the
testing requirements. How that will affect the state's nearly $1
billion commercial egg industry is unknown.
State and federal officials said they are furious at the federal
agencies responsible for ordering the tests. The directives, the
officials said, are based on arbitrary unscientific decisions and the
dioxin levels in meat represent no immediate health r k.
"This is obviously regulation overkill on the part of the FDE and
the [Environmental Protection Agency]," said Gov. Mike Huckabee.
"What they're going to end up doing, with no scientific data to
support them, is put thousands of Arkansans out of work either
permanently or temporarily and possibly go a long way toward
destroying our economy."
..
On the basis of dioxin found in 2-year-old fish samples, the Food
Safety and Inspection Service ordered catfish farmers to meet the
midnight Sunday testing deadline, which would have shut down much of
the catfish farming industry in Arkansas.
However, after two meetings late last week, the industry was
exempted from the deadline
.
Ben Noble, a legislative aide for Bumpers, said the FDA is planning
to announce its new deadline Thursday. After discussions with the
FDA, Noble said he thinks the deadline will be sometime next week and
the agency won't change its "arbitrary" 1 part-per-trillion
benchmark. . "We're doing everything we can at the state level to
express outrage," Huckabee said. "We're looking at every possible
option we have and we're not going to take this lying down."
The governor asked Dr. Sandra Nichols, director of the state
Department of Health, to look into the federal agencies' use of 1
part per trillion as its safety standard for human consumption.
Nichols said the Health Department consulted state and federal
health agencies and officials to find information on the subject.
"We can find no study or report or information that levels of 1 part
per trillion creates an acute or long-range threat," she said.
In fact, Nichols said, during the dioxin clean-up at the Vertac
Chemical Corp. plant in Jacksonville, the Health Department conducted
a study on a control group of Mabelvale residents that showed the
mean dioxin level in humans is 2.65 parts per trillion.
For 10 years, the FDA has had a game fish dioxin tolerance level of
25 parts per trillion, Nichols said. There has been no joint
standard for acceptable levels in other foods, Nichols said. .
Lawrence Bachorik, an FDA spokesman, said the
higher-than-1-part-per-trillion levels of dioxin detected in poultry
and fish aren't an immediate danger to consumers and that's why those
products aren't being pulled from grocery shelves. But, he said, the
1-part-per-trillion figure - arrived at in conjunction with the EPA
and USDA - is about 10 times the "background levels" in the
environment and anything higher than that is a concern over the long
term.
"With dioxin, the issue is in essence the lifetime burden of
exposure," Bachorik said. "There's a background level of dioxin
that everyone's exposed to. When you've identified a source and can
control it, you should shut that dioxin off." .. A month ago, USDA
directed 69 companies that handle chicken, turkey, beef and pork
products in Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas to
stop using the contaminated feed.
"You have to take action at some point," Knight [USDA spokesman]
said. "We're looking at this as though there is no immediate
concern. Scientists tell us that over time it could become a health
threat. [The directive] is a signal to the industry to get their
processes in order, and we feel that doing so is a manageable
situation.
Dickey [R-Ark] disagreed. After high-level meetings with agency
officials over the past several days, Dickey said he thinks the
testing level the agencies decided on is a trial balloon floated to
gauge industry reaction to possible future regulations.
"I don't know what they're saying," Dickey said. "I don't know what
the basis is for what they're saying. The sad part is . even though
[the directive] is not supported by scientific tests, it's affecting
markets not only in Arkansas, but nationally an worldwide.
..
How the directive will apply to eggs is a mystery, said Randy Wyatt,
vice president of the Arkansas Poultry Federation.
"Several of our companies have had to stop production," he said,
adding that the federation has advised Arkansas producers to begin
following the directive before today's midnight deadline. ..
Livestock and dairy producers in Arkansas have not been affected by
the directive, officials in those industries said Tuesday.
...
Livestock and dairy producers in Arkansas have not been affected by
the directive, officials in those industries said Tuesday
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pat Costner
P.O. Box 548, or 512 CR 2663
Eureka Springs, Arkansas 72632 USA
ph: 501-253-8440
fx: 501-253-5540
em: pat.costner@dialb.greenpeace.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~