[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Appraissing M$ successfullness
- To: "Multiple recipients of list" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: FW: Appraissing M$ successfullness
- From: Mitch Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 97 17:26:44 -0800
In reply to chuck's message sent 11/19/97 11:22 AM:
>Well, don't have solid facts but I'd thought NT sales was
>largely responsible for the recent disclosure that Gate's
>net worth ballooned to 44 Billion (of which a lot is MS stock -
>which brings up another point, if NT is such a lousy
>product why do private financiers bid up the price of MS
>stock to the 130's?).
Don't look to NT as significant support for Microsoft's bottom line, and
not especially as sustaining their stock price. Last I heard, NT's market
share was still in the middle single digits, and Microsoft's PE ratio was
around 50:1. (I think some investors need to be reminded that Microsoft
has _not_ discovered a cure for cancer.)
>HOWEVER - NT was originally poised to take over the world
>by running on Intel/Alpha/PowerPC & MIPS, but that threat
>has been alleviated - support for PowerPC and MIPS has been
>dropped, leaving the world safe for IRIX and PowerMacs to
>survive on their own merits. So NT/Mips and NT/PowerPC
>should definitely be on the list.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but the NT to PowerPC port was
funded by Motorola and IBM, not Microsoft.
He not only wants to win, but he wants to kill the competition.
He wants to bury the wounded. -- James Wallace, on Bill Gates
Boycott Microsoft ** http://www.vcnet.com/bms