[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Moderately improved Map
Claire, you are certainly not forced to put IE on your computer; neither
are you forced to use Visual Studio. I find nothing wrong however, with
a vendor of one component reusing that component in another tool,
especially when the reused component is available free to all comers.
Presumably, if many folks felt like you, Microsoft would reconsider
their position. I still don't understand where all the anger comes from.
David E. Y. Sarna firstname.lastname@example.org
ObjectSoft Corp. (NASDAQ:OSFT) http://www.objectsoftcorp.com
433 Hackensack Ave., Hackensack, NJ 07601
Tel.: (201) 343-9100 Fax: (201) 343-0056
> -----Original Message-----
> From: claribba [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 1997 9:25 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: RE: Moderately improved Map
> David Sarna wrote:
> >1. What exactly is wrong with Microsoft relying on portions of IE in
> >building Developer Studio?
> >2. Yes, the new Microsoft help tools are based on html. RoboHelp
> >Sky Software) has tools for creating this kind of help very easily,
> >converting existing help files.
> >3. IE4 reads the new help files perfectly. The price is right (free).
> >What us the problem, exactly?
> >David E. Y. Sarna firstname.lastname@example.org
> To David Sarna especially,
> Some of us don't ever want IE 3.xx, IE 4.xx or IE xxx.xx on our hard
> drives. Never. Don't you get it? I have already posted my main
> However I did want a program to keep Win95 from crashing.
> Claire Macdonald