[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Press Release!
Archer "Wins" But Fast Track Loses
Statement By Lori Wallach Director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch on
the Mark-Up of Archer's Radical Fast Track Proposal
The Archer bill is a fast track to the Stone Age strictly forbidding
environmental, labor, and food safety measures in trade agreements.
For the first time in U.S. history presidents would be affirmatively limited
in even negotiating labor, food safety or environmental issues in trade
talks and forbidden from including most such provisions under fast track
legislation. These new restrictions would continue for eight years.
The Archer proposal is a radical roll-back from the fast track President's
Bush and Reagan each used once. (Fast track has only even been used 5
times.) The Archer proposal would even require deletion of President Bush's
modest NAFTA environmental provisions, such as NAFTA Art. 104 which gave
partial protection to three environmental treaties in case of conflict under
NAFTA. This proposal also would forbid the provisions funding and approving
NAFTA's side pacts contained in the 1993 NAFTA implementing bill.
If this fast track proposal is ever adopted as U.S law, the Republicans will
have succeeded in their crusade to eliminate environmental and labor
measures from U.S. trade policy. Regardless of how the Clinton
Administration may try to spin this proposal, the fact that Chairman Archer
supports it makes clear that environmental and labor measures are newly and
strictly constrained. It is pathetic that President Clinton has not opposed
this retrograde Republican fast track backwards.
The Archer proposal tightens the Roth-Finance fast track restrictions on
labor, environment, human rights, religious freedom or other issues. Of
course the Roth-Finance fast track was more restrictive than the Clinton
proposal, which itself was more restrictive than the Reagan-Bush fast track.
The more radical the bill becomes, the less likely it will win the
Democratic support necessary to pass.
We stand with the consensus of consumer, family farm, religious, labor and
environmental groups in urging Congress to vote against it. The opposition
to fast track has grown considerably over the last few weeks to include
environmental organizations like the National Wildlife Federation and
Audubon whose support for NAFTA was critical to its passage in 1993.
****************************************************************************
/s/ Mike Dolan, Field Director, Global Trade Watch, Public Citizen
Join the Global Trade Watch list server. We will keep you up to date on
trade policy and politics. To subscribe, send this message: "SUBSCRIBE
TW-LIST" [followed by your name, your organizational affiliation and the
state in which you live] to LISTPROC@ESSENTIAL.ORG
Then check out our web-site ---> www.citizen.org/pctrade
WE EDUCATE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ORGANIZE THEM.
WE DON'T ORGANIZE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO EDUCATE THEM.
Fred Ross, Sr.