[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Buying fast-track votes
Journal of Commerce
Sept. 15, 1997
Guest Opinion
WASHINGTON BUREAU
Buying fast-track votes
As the White House searches for votes in Congress to
secure "fast track" trade negotiating authority for President
Clinton, the administration is suddenly becoming much
more sensitive to the demands of lawmakers, especially in
the trade area.
For example, since 1994, senators and representatives
could get barely a dime out of the North American
Development Bank, created along with the North
American Free Trade Agreement to fund environmental,
worker and other development efforts. Then, suddenly, in
July, the Treasury Department issued a list of communities
eligible to receive special assistance to deal with Nafta
worker dislocation.
After nearly four years in which the bank loaned no money
for such community assistance, a U.S. trade official told
House members recently the first such loans will be
approved in the next week or two.
Sam Gibbons, former Democratic chairman of the House
Ways and Means Committee, said the fast-track fight is
about buying votes.
"They're all just lining up for something, a bridge or a dam
or even a judge," said Mr. Gibbons, now working as a
lobbyist.
* * * *
Farm groups, which ardently support fast track, are among
those that plan to take full advantage of the administration's
frantic search for votes in Congress.
The agricultural sector was out front in supporting the
president on Nafta and is arguably the segment of the
economy that has most benefited in recent years from free
trade.
That means the White House will put American farmers
front and center in the debate. And, says one lobbyist, it
also means this is a good time for farmers to press trade
complaints against other countries. The U.S. Trade
Representative's office has recently announced its support
of U.S. producers in disputes with Mexico and the
Philippines.
* * * *
Opponents of fast track have their own plans. In a
telephone conversation with AFL-CIO President John
Sweeney to set strategy for the impending battle on Capitol
Hill, a leading House critic of Nafta, Rep. Marcy Kaptur,
D-Ohio, offered this idea:
"Let's get 2,000 or 3,000 people together -- victims of
trade -- and put hands together around the White House,"
Rep. Kaptur said. Recounting her proposal at a "teach in"
last week by opponents of fast track, Rep. Kaptur said she
thinks the only way to change the present course of trade
policy in Washington is to have a "very large public
demonstration of dissatisfaction."
* * * *