[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Free trade isn't all it's cracked up to be
- To: juhasza@rtk.net, becker@korrnet.org, walswor452@aol.com, carolyn@idcomm.com, hartwood@gvi.net, croper@cleanwater.org, dan.seligman@sfsierra.sierraclub.org, witness@w4peace.org, dawnlarson@aol.com, leaver@swcp.com, frs@netva.com, 76573.2076@compuserve.com, afscole@aol.com, jharring@falcon.cc.ukans.edu, irc1@zianet.com, heed@igc.apc.org, itterry@juno.com, agitprop@worldnet.att.net, james_scott@greenbuilder.com, jlivingston@igc.apc.org, evansjanice@msn.com, cg933@freenet.uchsc.edu, wafcjj@igc.org, jcostigan1@compuserve.com, jhans@msn.com, calaborfed@igc.org, ancelj@smtpgate.umkc.edu, rctamn@maroon.tc.umn.edu, vision@igc.apc.org, leekmichel@aol.com, kids@cybertours.com, williamslm@aol.com, clouse@rafiusa.org, mhogan@ahca.org, mwmorrill@aol.com, gra@inetport.com, pdradfor@juno.com, reforum@primenet.com, wicastf@execpc.com, massaflcio@aol.com, citizen@mail.multiverse.com, sissmith@prodigy.net, steve.fought@mail.house.gov, sjwtenn@aol.com, tw-list@essential.org, uwsa@uwsa.com, siliconv@bena.com, v_turner@conknet.com, vmenotti@igc.apc.org, cwiggins@proj.org, toor@spot.colorado.edu, jsmillie@worc.org
- Subject: Free trade isn't all it's cracked up to be
- From: MDOLAN <mdolan@citizen.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:22:00 -0500
- Cc: trade@citizen.org (Global Trade Watch)
- Organization: Public Citizen
- Sender: MDOLAN <mdolan@citizen.org>
from: http://www.theatlantic.com/atlantic/atlweb/polipro/pp9707.htm
Free trade isn't all it's cracked up to be
by Jack Beatty
The Atlantic Monthly
July 2, 1997
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was
signed into law three years ago. In the fight to pass the
legislation the Clinton Administration and its business allies
claimed that NAFTA would create more than 200,000 U.S.
jobs. In fact the Clinton Labor Department now concedes that
109,000 jobs have been officially lost to NAFTA. Public
Citizen, Ralph Nader's organization, released a report this past
February that calculated NAFTA job losses at 600,000.
Public Citizen arrived at that number by applying the
pro-NAFTA job-creation formulas to the $15 billion 1995
U.S. trade deficit with Mexico -- the idea being that if exports
to Mexico were supposed to create U.S. jobs, imports from
Mexico cost U.S. jobs.
The report convincingly disputes the Labor Department's
official count of jobs lost to NAFTA. Since the creation of
NAFTA the percentage of its clothes that Guess Inc. makes in
Los Angeles has fallen from 97 percent to 35 percent. A
thousand Guess workers lost their jobs in just two months last
year, yet the Labor Department did not include them in its
estimate of job losses due to NAFTA -- possibly because few
of the laid-off workers applied to the Department's little-known
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, set up under
NAFTA.
Another example: Before NAFTA, Florida tomatoes were a
$700-million industry; they are now a $400-million industry.
One hundred Florida tomato companies have been wiped out
by Mexican growers paying low wages. Thus far only one
company has filed for TAA assistance. It laid off a thousand
employees. Yet the thousands of other employees laid off by
the hundred failed companies are not included in the Labor
Department's estimate of NAFTA-caused job losses.
Public Citizen has also gathered information on the U.S.
companies who took the most public role in lobbying for
NAFTA in 1993. These companies made a total of sixty-six
company-specific promises about the U.S. jobs that NAFTA
would create. Fifty-nine of these sixty-six promises have been
broken, Public Citizen found. For example:
A General Electric representative told the House Foreign
Affairs Committee in October, 1993, that sales to Mexico
"could support 10,000 jobs for General Electric and its
suppliers." In fact the Labor Department certifies that
G.E. has laid off 2,304 workers because of NAFTA -- 2,108 of them
because of a "shift in production to Mexico."
Mattel, the toy maker, testified that NAFTA would create
jobs and "have a very positive impact on Mattel and more than
2,000 US employees." In fact the Labor Department certifies
that Mattel has laid off 520 workers at its Medina, New York,
factory because of "increased company imports from Mexico."
Johnson & Johnson promised that "an estimated 800 more
U.S. positions will be created as a result of trade with Mexico,
should NAFTA be approved." In fact since the creation of
NAFTA Johnson & Johnson has laid off 512 workers owing
to NAFTA -- 400 from a Little Rock plant because of a "shift
in production to Canada" and 112 from an El Paso plant
because of " a shift in production to Mexico."
Allied-Signal's Chairman told Lou Dobbs of CNN that his
company would not move jobs to Mexico as a result of
NAFTA. By official Labor Department figures Allied Signal
has shifted 992 jobs to Mexico since NAFTA.
A business coalition calling itself USA*NAFTA got thirty-five
Fortune 500 companies to serve as "captains" in the lobbying
drive for NAFTA. The captains contributed a total of $7.2
million in "soft money" to both parties in the most recent
election cycle. Seven captains -- including representatives from
DuPont, BankAmerica, United Technologies, American
International Group, and AT&T -- were invited for coffee at
the White House by President Clinton. Many of these same
corporations will soon be joining President Clinton in a
campaign to extend NAFTA to other countries in Latin America.
Since the creation of NAFTA employment in the maquiladora
plants along the U.S.-Mexico border has increased 48 percent.
Through a NAFTA subsidy program U.S. corporations setting
up shop in the maquiladoras can get away with paying their
Mexican workers three dollars a day instead of the standard
five dollars a day.
A recent House bill, The NAFTA Accountability Act
(HR-978), gives opponents of NAFTA a cause to rally to: the
bill would apply a do-no-harm certification process to NAFTA
and would require the President to renegotiate NAFTA with
Mexico in areas -- such as U.S. jobs and the environment --
where NAFTA is doing harm.
NAFTA was a massive betrayal of working American families
on the part of the American corporate, political, and journalistic
elites. NAFTA must not be extended further into Latin
America until HR 978 is passed and until NAFTA can be
certified as doing no harm to American society.
Copyright _ 1997 by The Atlantic Monthly Company. All
rights reserved.
***** NOTES from MDOLAN (MDOLAN @ CITIZEN) at 8/05/97 4:11 PM
****************************************************************************
/s/ Mike Dolan, Field Director, Global Trade Watch, Public Citizen
Join the Global Trade Watch list server. We will keep you up to date on
trade policy and politics. To subscribe, send this message: "SUBSCRIBE
TW-LIST" [followed by your name, your organizational affiliation and the
state in which you live] to LISTPROC@ESSENTIAL.ORG
Then check out our web-site ---> www.citizen.org/pctrade
WE EDUCATE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ORGANIZE THEM.
WE DON'T ORGANIZE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO EDUCATE THEM.
Fred Ross, Sr.