[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Norris' trial testimony
- Subject: Re: Norris' trial testimony
- From: Mitch Stone <mstone@vc.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 12:44:18 -0700
- cc: "Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO" <am-info@essential.org>
--- From a message sent by John J. Urbaniak on 6/12/1999 11:03 AM ---
>Give any other company all the technical advantages of OS/2 over Windows and
>Gates would have been reduced to a blubbering pile of jello.
>
>I still hold to my belief that there were/are Microsoft moles within IBM at
>high levels.
That's an interesting theory, but one that can't be proved or disproved.
I think the known facts speak for themselves -- IBM was bleeding at an
alarming rate during the early '90s, putting them in the mood to withdraw
support for any project that didn't fatten the short-term bottom line
significantly. One of those expendable projects was OS/2. If you look
back a few years earlier, you'll find the source of IBM's bleeding --
their failure to retain control of the PC architecture. I realize we've
already talked that one to death, and I only bring it up again because if
you connect the dots, I think you'll find a cause and effect relationship
that doesn't rely on unprovable conspiracy theories.
Mitch Stone
mstone@vc.net