[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LA Times: Expand Debt Relief
Los Angeles Times (editorial)
Friday, June 11, 1999
Debt Relief Must Be Expanded
The International Monetary Fund, the
World Bank and the seven richest
countries have been working on a way
to ease the crushing debt of the
world's 41 poorest countries. What
they have offered so far is a plan under
which only two of those
countries--Uganda and Bolivia--could qualify.
That's not enough. The G-7, whose finance
ministers are meeting this weekend in
Frankfurt, Germany, to improve the offer,
should draw up a much more generous plan
that would both ease the burden and reward
countries for progress in putting their
economic houses in order.
Much of the debt to international
financial institutions and the developed countries,
amounting to about $130 billion, was incurred
in the 1970s, largely to finance
ill-conceived projects, prop up corrupt
regimes or bail out commercial lenders. In the
subsequent years, debtor countries had to
borrow simply to pay the interest. As their
economies deteriorated and the prices of
commodities declined, the burden of their debt
increased. Today, most of the 700 million
people of the so-called "highly indebted
poor countries" live in grinding poverty,
their economies saddled with revolving
credits and unable to attract commercial
lenders. The toll in human terms is staggering,
as governments spend more on servicing their
debts than on health or education.
The existing international debt
reduction programs are designed to cut the poor
countries' debt to "sustainable" levels,
provided they stick to IMF-prescribed
restructuring targets for six years.
A U.S. proposal to the G-7 is somewhat
more generous than the IMF initiative, but
it too doesn't go far enough. It calls for
forgiveness on most aid-related loans, which
account for less than a third of the total,
and sets unrealistically high sustainable target
levels for the bulk of the debt. Ten or more
countries still would not be able to meet
those thresholds.
The plan ultimately agreed on by the G-7
governments should benefit all poor
countries that pursue prudent economic
policies. Specifically, it should provide for a
complete write-off of aid-related loans.
Other debt should be written down to levels
that the countries can service without
sacrificing their health, education and sustainable
development programs. The plan should be
flexible enough to provide greater relief for
countries struck by natural disaster or a
sudden drop in commodity prices. Anything
less would only perpetuate their poverty.
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights
Reserved