[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pressure & Shell is most profitable co.
Nigeria faces renewed pressure to restore democracy
BY JAMES JUKWEY
LAGOS, July 14 (Reuter) - Pressure from the West appears to be building on
Nigeria's military rulers to restore democracy and respect human rights.
Sensing this could be their chance to force real change, opposition leaders
are urging the world community to tighten the screws on the West African oil
nation.
``Concerted action by the international community, and by this I mean real
sanctions, can bring about the desired effect,'' said Senator Abraham
Adesanya, acting chairman of the umbrella National Democratic Coalition
opposition group.
``This is the time for sanctions to be imposed,'' he told Reuters in Lagos
after the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) met Nigerian
dissidents in London last Friday.
The renewed interest in Nigeria centres on former colonial power Britain,
where a new Labour government is touting human rights and democracy as part
of its foreign policy.
``The new British posture is critical to what shape any international action
on Nigeria will take,'' says pro-democracy activist Olu Agboola.
Opposition newspapers gleefully reported recent remarks by a British
official on Africa, Tony Lloyd, that London would not accept military ruler
General Sani Abacha if he were to win next year's poll to become an elected
president unless the electoral process was made more transparent than at
present.
They were disappointed when the much publicised meeting of CMAG with
Nigerian dissidents did not announce any specific measures against the
Nigerian government.
But analysts say the renewed pressure is unlikely to ease unless there is
clear improvement in human rights and Abacha pursues his transition
programme vigorously.
``We should improve on our domestic policies and then we shall see a change
in the attitude of the West,'' says Yomi Dinakin, a senior lecturer in
international law and diplomacy at the University of Lagos.
Nigeria drew international ire in June 1993 when the army voided an election
of a civilian president.
Abacha seized power five months later in the confusion that ensued and has
detained Moshood Abiola, presumed winner of the annulled poll, since 1994
when the wealthy businessman proclaimed himself president in defiance of the
army.
International pressure to restore democracy reached fever pitch in November
1995 when the military government defied world opinion and hanged nine
minority rights activists including writer Ken Saro-Wiwa.
Nigeria was immediately suspended from the Commonwealth while European Union
and the United States imposed sanctions, but these did not include an
embargo on Nigeria's oil exports, its economic lifeline. The opposition
wanted oil exports banned.
Then followed a prolonged lull as Abacha launched a three-year plan for
transition to civil rule that his opponents say replicates similar
programmes that failed.
``The entire transition programme is a sham,'' says Ayo Obe, president of
the Civil Liberties Organisation, the leading human rights advocacy group in
the country.
What is needling the West and Nigerian opposition is the likelihood that
Abacha might stand in the polls set for August 1, 1998. The transition plan
calls for the government to be handed over to an elected president on
October 1, 1998.
He has not said he would, but many groups with obvious official backing,
have sprung up to urge him to stand and their so-called solidarity rallies
are diligently reported by the official media, especially state television.
Analysts say Abacha's transition would get Western backing if he were to
categorically declare that he would not stand to succeed himself as
president next year.
They say the release of political prisoners would also give credibility to
the transition programme.
``The release of Abiola will assuage the international community and calm
down tempers,'' says Lagos lawyer Victor Iyanam, adding: ``And then he
should be allowed to join any of the parties, if he so desires.''
Otherwise, diplomats said, Abacha could expect the current Western posture
to lead to action, such as freezing Nigerian assets and even an oil embargo,
to force Africa's most populous nation to democratise and respect human
rights. Reut07:03 07-14-97
-------------------------------
GM tops Fortune list of world's 500 biggest companies
NEW YORK (Reuter) - General Motors Corp. drove to the top spot in Fortune
magazine's list of the world's 500 biggest companies, fueled by a wave of
restructurings that also lifted archrival Ford Motor Co. to No. 2 in
revenues, the magazine said.
GM, with $168.4 billion in fiscal 1996 revenues, and Ford, with nearly $147
billion, displaced the Japanese trading giants that have led the Fortune
Global 500 for the past two years, the magazine said in its Aug. 4 issue,
which hits newsstands next Monday.
``And what's been good for General Motors is increasingly proving good for
the rest of the world as well,'' Fortune said of the restructurings,
pointing to a 25.1 percent rise in the 500 companies' total fiscal 1996
profits to $404.4 billion.
By comparison, total revenues increased just 0.5 percent to $11.4 trillion,
the smallest increase since Fortune began compiling the global list in 1990.
Fortune, however, said its tally was skewed by new accounting standards at
the top Japanese trading companies -- without the change, revenues would
have risen 2 percent, level with inflation.
The most profitable company on the list was Anglo-Dutch oil colossus Royal
Dutch/Shell Group, which earned $8.9 billion on $128.2 billion in revenues.
Thirty-one of the most profitable companies and seven of the top 10 were
American, Fortune said.
U.S. and Japanese companies dominated the top positions in the Global 500,
which included privately owned companies and cooperatives that publish
financial figures and report all or part of the data to a government agency.
Japanese trading houses Mitsui & Co. Ltd. ($144.9 million in revenues),
Mitsubishi Corp. ($140.2 million) and Itochu Corp. ($135.5 million) took
third, fourth and fifth place, respectively.
Mitsubishi fell from first place in the 1996 listing, Mitsui dropped from
No. 2 and Itochu No. 3.
Royal Dutch/Shell was in the sixth spot in the lastest list, followed by
another Japanese trading house, Marubeni Corp. Rounding out the top 10 were
U.S. oil giant Exxon Corp., Japanese trading house Sumitomo Corp. and
automaker Toyota Motor Corp.
The last company to make the cut was the Banca Monta Dei Paschi di Siena of
Italy, with $9.2 billion in revenues.
All companies on the Global 500 had to report earnings on or before March
31, 1997.
Fortune said two newcomers emphasized the increasingly global nature of the
business: Russia's RAO Gazprom, No. 146, and China's Sinochem (204), the
third Chinese company on the 500.
The United States had the most companies on the list, 162, up from 153 the
previous year. Japan was second with 126, a decline from last year's 141,
and France came in third with 42, unchanged from the previous year. Germany
was fourth with 41, up from 40, and Britain fifth with 34, up from 32.
Despite an overall surge in profits last year, not everything was rosy for
the Global 500. The five biggest money-losers, in descending order, were
Banco do Brasil SA, with $8.01 billion in losses; the French railroad SNCF
($3.43 billion); Nippon Credit Bank Ltd. ($3.34 billion); bank Credit Suisse
Group ($2.09 billion) and Swiss Bank Corp.
Some companies left the list because of acquisitions. They included Chemical
Bank, now part of 107th-place Chase Manhattan Corp.; Swiss pharmaceutical
companies Sandoz AG and Ciba-Geigy AG, now Novartis AG at No. 95; and Bank
of Tokyo, which became part of Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, No. 41.
Fortune's list may also be found on Pathfinder, Time Warner Inc.'s Web site,
at http://fortune.com.