[Upd-discuss] Obligation to Finance Free and Open Public Knowledge Goods
Richard Stallman
rms@gnu.org
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:29:09 -0500
This is quite rough, but consider for
example, an obligation of 1 basis point (.001 of GDP), adjusted downward
using a sliding scale based upon the relative position on the UNDP Human
Development Index (the approach taken in the Canadian royalty guidelines
for exports of medicines).
I think that approach is misguided, since it says that a country with
a history of using its money ineffectively for human development can
spend less of it in this form of human development. That is
backwards. I don't see why the US should be entitled to spend a
smaller proportion of its GDP this way than Norway spends.
However, a given percentage of GDP would be a much larger fraction of
the government budget. I don't know what fraction of the US GDP the
Federal budget is--do you know?