[Upd-discuss] #2 Copyright Brief History

[Michael Hart]

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 Jsavirimuthu@aol.com wrote:

>
> My earlier email with the attachment may not be acceptable. So here is the
> reply with the hyperlink instead:
>
>
> BTW, did  you see the article in which the Fortune
> 500 are being encouraged to do  what was illegal
> for Napster, Morpheus and Kazaa to do???
>
> This really begs a number of questions with regard to re-directing  reform
> issues. So...how do we incorporate the Rawlsian thesis of Public  Reason into
> discourse about the commons as a protectible constitutional  good (ie an
> exploration of converging theory with practice on the one hand and  market idealism
> with constitutional aspirations. Is there any apetitie (and Im  still digesting
> the excellent contributions, not least from my erstwhile  colleage from
> GUTENBERG) to dissect the article by Sprigman?. If UPD is not  appropriate -
> CyberBug is happy to host a discussion.
>
> _http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=578502_
> (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=578502)
>
> Joseph
> Liverpool Law  School
> jsaviri@liverpool.ac.uk
> http://savirimuthu.typepad.com
>

Please feel free to relay any of my comments to CyberBug,
and to relay any replies to me.

Thanks!

Michael