[Upd-discuss] patenting genes
Richard Stallman
rms@gnu.org
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:05:04 -0700 (MST)
I remain unclear on how it is that patents are granted for genes. Why is
not the discovery of a gene a non-patentable discovery rather than a
patentable invention?
The justification that the patent system offers is that the gene
has been isolated in a pure form, and that that is a substance
distinct from what is found in natural chromosomes.
It seems rather strained logic to me. It seems to reflect a
desire on the part of the patent system to stretch its rules
to permit more kinds of patents.