[Random-bits] L&E - CSC on WIPO debate on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions
James Love
james.love@cptech.org
Fri Nov 19 07:59:02 2004
Civil Society Coalition Statement on the proposal by the Delegation of
Chile on Limitations and Exceptions
November 19, 2004
The Civil Society Coalition supports the proposal by Chile to address
issues concerning limitations and exceptions. There has been a dramatic
increase in the scope of ownership rights in knowledge goods and new
efforts to increase enforcement of these new rights.
Also, largely because of the Internet, there has been an increase in
cross border trade in knowledge goods. Today important industries,
non-profit organizations and social movements are also involved in the
creation of knowledge goods. These producers of knowledge goods and the
users of these knowledge goods are poorly served by the current
patchwork of exceptions.
Chile has highlighted the concerns of the visually impaired, libraries,
and educators. The problems facing these stakeholders are substantial,
particularly, as they relate to access to digital material.
To the group of stakeholders Chile has identified, we would add several
others, individuals for personal use, and exceptions which are critical
for new Internet industries including services such as Google which rely
extensively upon exceptions and which serve the access to knowledge
needs of millions of people.
There is also the very large issue of the relationship between new
technological protection measures (TPMs) and the ability of the public
to exercise or benefit from limitations and exceptions that promote
access to knowledge or the control of anti-competitive practices.
WIPO’s role in addressing the issues of limitations and exceptions
should be discussed. There are many possibilities for constructive
actions. WIPO, as an inter-governmental body, could discuss and debate
best practices for limitations and exceptions in specific areas. WIPO
could create a protocol within the proposed treaty on access to
knowledge for minimum limitations and exceptions or at least best
practices.
WIPO could have information sessions on the relationship between TPMs
and limitations and exceptions and propose solutions in form of
regulations of TPMs which would ensure that they do not destroy the
important role that limitations and exceptions have in protecting access
to knowledge.
--
James Love | Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org | mailto:james.love@cptech.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 200036
voice +1.202.387.8030 | fax +1.202.234.5176