[Med-privacy] (no subject)

[Peter Marshall]

--Apple-Mail-2-492280474
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: image/gif;
	x-unix-mode=0666;
	name="lat_both.gif"
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename=lat_both.gif
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--Apple-Mail-2-492280474
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-3-492280474


--Apple-Mail-3-492280474
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-idtheft17sep17,0,888806.story?=20
track=3Dtothtml
U.S. Policy on Medicare Cards Is a Boon for Identity Thieves
  By Kathy M. Kristof
  Times Staff Writer

  September 17, 2005

  To guard against identity theft, John and Mary Benbow of La Jolla took =
=20
their first names off their personal checks, using their initials =20
instead. They shred documents that show any of their identification =20
numbers and carry credit cards only when they plan to use them.

  Whenever they see a doctor or go to the pharmacy, however, they must =20=

present Medicare cards inscribed with their Social Security numbers =97 =20=

numbers widely viewed as the keys to identify theft. Photocopies of the =20=

cards are routinely attached to their medical records, making the =20
information available to anyone with access to their files.

  Seeking to cut the risk of identity theft, California and other states =
=20
have passed laws forcing private insurers to remove Social Security =20
numbers from healthcare cards. But these laws don't apply to federal =20
agencies and programs such as Medicare or to other institutions that =20
use Social Security numbers for identification, including many colleges =20=

and universities.

  "I feel it's very dangerous to have to carry a Medicare card with my =20=

Social Security number on it, knowing how valuable this is to people =20
who are trying to steal my identity," said Mary Benbow, 67.

  "This is something that we have been screaming about for years," said =20=

Linda Foley, co-executive director of the Identity Theft Resource =20
Center in San Diego. "Our most vulnerable populations due to =20
overexposure of their Social Security numbers are students, seniors and =20=

members of the armed forces."

  Foley and others say the federal government's widespread use of Social =
=20
Security numbers is even more exasperating given that the Federal Trade =20=

Commission =97 the government's primary consumer protection agency =97 =
is =20
on the front lines of efforts to combat identify theft.

  Among other things, the FTC advises consumers with Social Security =20
numbers on their health insurance cards to ask their insurer to use =20
another number instead. Consumer groups offer similar advice.

  "We tell people all the time that they shouldn't carry their Social =20=

Security number in their wallet," said Susanna Montezemolo, a policy =20
analyst with Consumers Union in Washington. "Their response is, 'Well, =20=

it's on my Medicare card.' "

  With an estimated 42 million Americans under its umbrella, the federal =
=20
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issues more cards with =20
Social Security numbers than any other agency except for the Social =20
Security Administration itself.

  Spokesman Peter Ashkenaz said that Medicare officials were aware of =20=

the concerns involving use of the numbers and that alternatives had =20
been discussed. But so far, he said, there were no plans to issue cards =20=

with different numbers, which would probably cost $100 million and =20
require retooling the agency's computer systems.

  "What we tell people to do is treat it like a credit card," Ashkenaz =20=

said. "Use it only when you need to and don't share the information =20
with anyone who doesn't need to know."

  That answer hasn't satisfied privacy advocates in Congress. In June, =20=

the House passed an appropriations bill with a rider introduced by Rep. =20=

Bob Filner (D-Chula Vista) that would require Medicare to stop issuing =20=

cards with the numbers starting Jan. 1. The bill is now in the Senate.

  Filner says the measure is just a first step and that he expects to =20=

introduce bills that would strip Social Security numbers from other =20
governmentissued cards.

  "We are going to go agency by agency and get rid of the Social =20
Security number on everything," Filner said Friday. "These agencies =20
keep telling us how difficult it is, but we are going to keep pushing =20=

it."

  One target will be the Defense Department. Social Security numbers are =
=20
emblazoned on the identification cards carried around by an estimated 8 =20=

million military men and women and their families, which they use to =20
gain access to computers at work or their base commissaries.

  "The requirement that military personnel use the Social Security =20
number for practically everything is nothing short of criminal," said =20=

Beth Givens, executive director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. "I =20=

got an e-mail from one military member who said he was required to =20
stencil his name and Social Security number on his duffel bag. It's =20
really outrageous."

  Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, a Defense Department spokeswoman, confirmed =20
that armed forces personnel could be required by their superiors to =20
stencil Social Security numbers on their belongings, but said it was =20
not a department policy.

  Krenke said that the Geneva Convention required military personnel to =20=

disclose their name, rank and serial number, and that the military used =20=

the Social Security number as the serial number. But she declined to =20
discuss the rationale for the policy.

  "The Department of Defense does not have any plans to change this =20
requirement, but will continue to review it," Krenke said in an =20
e-mailed statement.

  The FTC estimates that more than 3 million Americans have their =20
identities stolen each year and that the number of thefts is on the =20
rise.

  Full identity theft occurs when a criminal hijacks a person's identity =
=20
to open charge accounts in that person's name. A more limited form of =20=

identity theft occurs when someone uses stolen credit cards.

  Obtaining a Social Security number is considered the key to full =20
identity theft because having that number is needed to obtain new =20
credit in the victim's name.

  A 2002 report by the Government Accountability Office noted that =20
Medicare and the military were just part of the problem. A wide array =20=

of state, federal and municipal offices =97 such as courts and licensing =
=20
agencies =97 are large-scale collectors of personal information, =20
including Social Security numbers, and they do not uniformly enforce =20
policies that would protect those numbers from disclosure.

  Many agencies said "preserving the integrity of the record" was more =20=

important than preserving the privacy of the individual, the report =20
said.

  Neither the Government Accountability Office nor the FTC could =20
estimate how many instances of identity theft might be linked to use of =20=

governmentissued papers such as Medicare cards, in part because an =20
estimated 75% of victims say they have no idea how their identity was =20=

stolen, according to the GAO.

  The 1974 federal Privacy Act limited the collection of Social Security =
=20
numbers by government agencies and required that they inform consumers =20=

when providing the number was optional. Consumer advocates say the =20
policy isn't widely known and is often ignored.

  Dick Harriff of San Diego said he recently had to give his Social =20
Security number to get a rebate from the San Diego County Water =20
Authority for a water-saving toilet. Harriff, who reluctantly provided =20=

the number, said, "My greed prevailed at the expense of the intellect."

  Spokesman John Liarakos confirmed that the water authority required =20=

the Social Security number for rebates, but said the information was =20
kept secure and confidential.

  Why the policy? Liarakos pointed to Uncle Sam.

  "The federal government requires that we provide a 1099 [income tax =20=

form] for anyone who gets more than $600 a year in total rebates," =20
Liarakos said. "This is how we track who gets 1099s."

Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times |=

--Apple-Mail-3-492280474
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252

<=
fontfamily><param>Copperplate</param><color><param>0000,4949,7A7A</param>h=
ttp://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-idtheft17sep17,0,888806.story?track=3D=
tothtml</color></fontfamily>

<bold><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><bigger><bigger>U.S. Policy
on Medicare Cards Is a Boon for Identity Thieves

=
</bigger></bigger></fontfamily></bold><fontfamily><param>Copperplate</para=
m>
By Kathy M. Kristof

 Times Staff Writer


 September 17, 2005


 To guard against identity theft, John and Mary Benbow of La Jolla
took their first names off their personal checks, using their initials
instead. They shred documents that show any of their identification
numbers and carry credit cards only when they plan to use them.


 Whenever they see a doctor or go to the pharmacy, however, they must
present Medicare cards inscribed with their Social Security numbers =97
numbers widely viewed as the keys to identify theft. Photocopies of
the cards are routinely attached to their medical records, making the
information available to anyone with access to their files.


 Seeking to cut the risk of identity theft, California and other
states have passed laws forcing private insurers to remove Social
Security numbers from healthcare cards. But these laws don't apply to
federal agencies and programs such as Medicare or to other
institutions that use Social Security numbers for identification,
including many colleges and universities.


 "I feel it's very dangerous to have to carry a Medicare card with my
Social Security number on it, knowing how valuable this is to people
who are trying to steal my identity," said Mary Benbow, 67.


 "This is something that we have been screaming about for years," said
Linda Foley, co-executive director of the Identity Theft Resource
Center in San Diego. "Our most vulnerable populations due to
overexposure of their Social Security numbers are students, seniors
and members of the armed forces."


 Foley and others say the federal government's widespread use of
Social Security numbers is even more exasperating given that the
Federal Trade Commission =97 the government's primary consumer
protection agency =97 is on the front lines of efforts to combat
identify theft.


 Among other things, the FTC advises consumers with Social Security
numbers on their health insurance cards to ask their insurer to use
another number instead. Consumer groups offer similar advice.


 "We tell people all the time that they shouldn't carry their Social
Security number in their wallet," said Susanna Montezemolo, a policy
analyst with Consumers Union in Washington. "Their response is, 'Well,
it's on my Medicare card.' "


 With an estimated 42 million Americans under its umbrella, the
federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issues more cards
with Social Security numbers than any other agency except for the
Social Security Administration itself.


 Spokesman Peter Ashkenaz said that Medicare officials were aware of
the concerns involving use of the numbers and that alternatives had
been discussed. But so far, he said, there were no plans to issue
cards with different numbers, which would probably cost $100 million
and require retooling the agency's computer systems.


 "What we tell people to do is treat it like a credit card," Ashkenaz
said. "Use it only when you need to and don't share the information
with anyone who doesn't need to know."


 That answer hasn't satisfied privacy advocates in Congress. In June,
the House passed an appropriations bill with a rider introduced by
Rep. Bob Filner (D-Chula Vista) that would require Medicare to stop
issuing cards with the numbers starting Jan. 1. The bill is now in the
Senate.


 Filner says the measure is just a first step and that he expects to
introduce bills that would strip Social Security numbers from other
governmentissued cards.


 "We are going to go agency by agency and get rid of the Social
Security number on everything," Filner said Friday. "These agencies
keep telling us how difficult it is, but we are going to keep pushing
it."


 One target will be the Defense Department. Social Security numbers
are emblazoned on the identification cards carried around by an
estimated 8 million military men and women and their families, which
they use to gain access to computers at work or their base
commissaries.


 "The requirement that military personnel use the Social Security
number for practically everything is nothing short of criminal," said
Beth Givens, executive director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
"I got an e-mail from one military member who said he was required to
stencil his name and Social Security number on his duffel bag. It's
really outrageous."


 Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, a Defense Department spokeswoman, confirmed
that armed forces personnel could be required by their superiors to
stencil Social Security numbers on their belongings, but said it was
not a department policy.


 Krenke said that the Geneva Convention required military personnel to
disclose their name, rank and serial number, and that the military
used the Social Security number as the serial number. But she declined
to discuss the rationale for the policy.


 "The Department of Defense does not have any plans to change this
requirement, but will continue to review it," Krenke said in an
e-mailed statement.


 The FTC estimates that more than 3 million Americans have their
identities stolen each year and that the number of thefts is on the
rise.


 Full identity theft occurs when a criminal hijacks a person's
identity to open charge accounts in that person's name. A more limited
form of identity theft occurs when someone uses stolen credit cards.


 Obtaining a Social Security number is considered the key to full
identity theft because having that number is needed to obtain new
credit in the victim's name.


 A 2002 report by the Government Accountability Office noted that
Medicare and the military were just part of the problem. A wide array
of state, federal and municipal offices =97 such as courts and licensing
agencies =97 are large-scale collectors of personal information,
including Social Security numbers, and they do not uniformly enforce
policies that would protect those numbers from disclosure.


 Many agencies said "preserving the integrity of the record" was more
important than preserving the privacy of the individual, the report
said.


 Neither the Government Accountability Office nor the FTC could
estimate how many instances of identity theft might be linked to use
of governmentissued papers such as Medicare cards, in part because an
estimated 75% of victims say they have no idea how their identity was
stolen, according to the GAO.


 The 1974 federal Privacy Act limited the collection of Social
Security numbers by government agencies and required that they inform
consumers when providing the number was optional. Consumer advocates
say the policy isn't widely known and is often ignored.


 Dick Harriff of San Diego said he recently had to give his Social
Security number to get a rebate from the San Diego County Water
Authority for a water-saving toilet. Harriff, who reluctantly provided
the number, said, "My greed prevailed at the expense of the intellect."


 Spokesman John Liarakos confirmed that the water authority required
the Social Security number for rebates, but said the information was
kept secure and confidential.


 Why the policy? Liarakos pointed to Uncle Sam.


 "The federal government requires that we provide a 1099 [income tax
form] for anyone who gets more than $600 a year in total rebates,"
Liarakos said. "This is how we track who gets 1099s."


</fontfamily><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><smaller>Copyright
2005 Los Angeles Times |</smaller></fontfamily>=

--Apple-Mail-3-492280474--

--Apple-Mail-2-492280474--