[Med-privacy] State Privacy Protections and Civil Suits Concerned with HIPAA Law

Jeff Williams jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:06:59 -0700


pmarshall and all,

pmarshall wrote:

> >
> >
> >
> >  This would indicate to me that either stronger or different medical
> >privacy laws by state are needed or each state needs to enact
> >better and perhaps stronger medical privacy practices/legislation..
> >
>
> Has generally been the case for some time....

  Agreed.  However such privacy legislation seems to be heading
in the opposite direction...

>
>
> >
> >  The alternative is a change to the Medical Privacy Act
> >
> Eh? What's that?

?????

>
>
> > which would
> >also seem to be in conflict with the Patriot Act in some sections
> >thereof...
> >
>
> The "change" or the "MPA?"

  The change IMHO.  Conflicting security and privacy laws
cannot by definition be a good or best practice and function
cooperatively...

>
>
> >
> >  Privacy of medical information is A key to the war on terror....
> >
> Or a lack of such privacy...?

  No!  Definitely not!  Stronger medical privacy serves as a tool
to fighting the war on terror, not lack there of...

>
>
> >
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827