[Med-privacy] ruling in HIPAA suit

pmarshall pwm@comcast.net
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:16:31 -0700


--------------010304080809000305040606
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
          
<table cellspacing="0" width="100%" cellpadding="0" border="0">
  	<tbody>
     <tr>
  		<td>       <br>
      </td>
  	</tr>
  	<tr>
  		<td><img src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif"
 width="1" height="4" alt="" border="0">
       </td>
  	</tr>
    
  </tbody> 
</table>
   
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
 bgcolor="#ffffff">
  	<tbody>
     <tr>
  		<td colspan="3"><img
 src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" width="4"
 height="20">
       </td>
   	</tr>
  	<tr>
  		<td><img src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif"
 width="20" height="4" border="0">
       </td>
  		<td> 		 			  	  	  		 	 		 		 		 		 		 		 	 	 	      
      <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
  		<tbody>
           <tr>
   			<td colspan="2" nowrap="nowrap"> 			 	 				  				 			 			<br>
            </td>
   		</tr>
   		<tr>
  			<td colspan="2"> 			<img
 src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" width="1" height="4"
 align="left" hspace="0" border="0" alt="">
  			</td>
  		</tr>
  	 		<tr>
  			<td colspan="2" class="textblue12"> 				<img
 src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" width="2"
 height="10" align="left" hspace="0" border="0" alt="">
  				 				 					<span class="textblack14">Federal Judge Upholds HIPAA Provision</span><br>
  					<img src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" width="2"
 height="7">
             <br>
  					April 05, 2004<br>
             <br>
  				 			</td>
  		</tr>
  	 		<tr>
  			<td colspan="2" class="textblack12">  			A federal judge on Friday ruled 
that a new HIPAA provision enacted last April didn't violate patients' constitutional 
rights to privacy and due process, the <a
 href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/8343965.htm?1c"
 target="_blank"><cite>Philadelphia Inquirer</cite></a> reports. Philadelphia 
U.S. District Judge Mary McLaughlin also ruled that HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson 
was not legally responsible to "act affirmatively to protect those rights" 
(Slobodzian, <cite>Philadelphia Inquirer</cite>, 4/3). <br>
             <br>
 The plaintiffs sued HHS and alleged that the department "sabotaged" a privacy
 provision that required a patient's written consent whenever confidential
 medical data was released, the <cite>Associated Press</cite> reports (Caruso, 
            <cite>Associated Press</cite>, 4/2).<br>
             <br>
 "What she is essentially saying is that it's OK under the Constitution for 
an individual's right of privacy to be determined by someone other than the 
individual," James Pyles, a lawyer who filed the suit on behalf of <a
 href="http://www.citizens.org/" target="_blank">Citizens for Health</a> and
17 other individuals and groups, said of McLaughlin's ruling.<br>
             <br>
 However, defense attorneys said that Pyles and the plaintiffs "overstated" 
the provision's threat to personal privacy, the <cite>Inquirer</cite> reports 
(<cite>Philadelphia Inquirer</cite>, 4/3). Government lawyers also said that 
the provision is intended to give patients "unprecedented power to ensure 
that their records are distributed to as small a circle of caregivers as possible"
(<cite>Associated Press</cite>, 4/2).<br>
             <br>
 Pyles said he will meet with his clients to discuss challenging the ruling 
before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (<cite>Philadelphia Inquirer</cite>, 
4/3).<br>
             <br>
 In related news, <a
 href="http://www.healthcareitnews.com/NewsArticleView.aspx?ContentID=467"
 target="_blank"><cite>Healthcare IT News</cite></a> this week looked at the
Justice Department's recent attempt to obtain patients' medical records to
gather information about late-term abortions. While court rulings deemed the
department's efforts an invasion of privacy, the article raises the question 
of whether it would have been easier for the government to access patient 
information if the records had been electronic (Monegain, <cite>Healthcare 
IT News</cite>, 4/5). 				<img
 src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" border="0" width="1"
 height="7">
             <br>
             <br>
  				 			</td>
  		</tr>
   	 	        
        </tbody>       
      </table>
  	<br>
       <br>
  	 	 	 	 	 		  	    		  	<!-- End rendering Main content --> 		</td>
  		<td><img src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif"
 width="20" height="4" alt="" border="0">
       </td>
  	</tr>
     
  </tbody> 
</table>
          
<table cellspacing="0" width="100%" cellpadding="0" border="0">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
  	<td><br>
       </td>
  	<td> 		      
      <hr> 	</td>
       <td> 	<br>
       </td>
       <td><br>
       </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
  	<td colspan="3"> 		<img
 src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif" width="2"
 height="10" alt="" border="0">
   	</td>
       <td> <br>
       </td>
     </tr>
  <tr>
  	<td><img src="http://www.ihealthbeat.org/images/spacer.gif"
 width="20" height="4" alt="" border="0">
       </td>
  	<td class="text9" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff"> 		 		iHealthBeat </td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>

--------------010304080809000305040606--