[Ip-health] WSJ ASIA: Letters to the Editor Debating Thailand's Drug Patent Policies
Ellen T HOEN
Ellen.T.HOEN@paris.msf.org
Thu Mar 13 17:30:09 2008
Letters to the Editor
Debating Thailand's Drug Patent Policies
5 March 2008
The Wall Street Journal Asia, The Wall Street Journal Europe
Every day, Medecins Sans Frontieres/Doctors Without Borders is confronted
with two deadly truths that show how relying on "the profit motive to
research and develop new drugs" is a woefully inadequate response to
addressing the health needs of people in developing countries.
First, those who cannot afford the price of medicines must simply go
untreated. Thailand's recent moves to overcome the barriers posed by
patents are an attempt to address that stark reality. When Thailand issued
a compulsory license for the HIV/AIDS medicine efavirenz in 2006, health
authorities were able to import a generic version at a fraction of the
cost, allowing doctors to treat thousands more patients with this
important medicine. In doing this, Thailand utilized internationally
recognized legal provisions in World Trade Organization rules, not a
"loophole" as The Wall Street Journal misstates.
Second, diseases that hit first and foremost the poor, like tuberculosis
or sleeping sickness, do not attract research and development. Like any
corporation, a drug firm looks to the bottom line. When there is no viable
market, there is no investment, and consequently no drugs. Pharmaceutical
research and development is costly, and somebody does need to pay. New
ways must be devised to stimulate medical innovation, while ensuring that
whether patients can actually access life-saving medicines is not an
afterthought, but a core concern. Today, even some pharmaceutical
companies recognize the weakness of the patent system to deliver for the
developing world. The profit motive, which abandons so many to their fate,
cannot be the only answer.
Dr. Buddhima Lokuge
U.S. Manager,
Access to Essential Medicines Campaign
Medecins Sans Frontieres/
Doctors Without Borders
New York
---
Your editorial on Feb. 27 ("Bangkok's Drug War, Round Two") implies that
Thailand's former government misused a World Trade Organization provision,
known as compulsory licensing, which allows developing countries to
produce or import cheaper drugs for their people in certain circumstances.
Oxfam insists that Thailand's actions are perfectly legal. Even the World
Health Organization supported the use of this provision. The country
merely applied a basic public health safeguard which has been used
repeatedly by developing countries to reduce the prices of vital medicines
when faced with public health challenges, like the one Thailand is now
facing.
The compulsory licensing policy is necessary because the pharmaceutical
industry has not taken the steps your editorial claims. Nearly all
pharmaceutical companies have failed to truly institute affordable pricing
for their medicines in response to the economic reality of each developing
country. Thailand's decision to use and apply public health safeguards was
needed precisely because Big Pharma ignored and delayed the Thai
government in negotiating fair and sensible price reductions.
If the job of the new health minister, Chaiya Sasomsup, is to look after
the health of all people in Thailand, Oxfam maintains that Mr. Chaiya
should continue using compulsory licensing. As he reflects over whether or
not to go ahead with further approvals, we can only hope that the minister
will rightly put the health of Thailand's poorest communities ahead of
profits.
Sarah Ireland
Oxfam Regional Director for East Asia
Oxford, England
---
While the premise of your editorial is correct, you lose important nuance
in your discussion of the problem of Thailand, and any nation, which
breaks patents on drugs. For a variety of reasons -- regional price
setting preventing efficient pricing, inertia, lack of attention from head
office, concerns about drug diversion and reimportation, etc. -- most drug
companies do not tier prices for most of their drugs. Drugs for HIV and
other high profile diseases are the exception. Breaking patents is not a
good solution, but Western companies have to do more to tier their drug
prices if they are to sensibly prevent governments, like Thailand's, from
acting abusively. This will hopefully also stop economically illiterate
NGOs from having any further influence in such locations.
Roger Bate
Resident Fellow
American Enterprise Institute
Washington, D.C.