[Ip-health] IP-Watch: WIPO Director’s Planned Early Depar ture Draws Mixed Reactions

[Thiru Balasubramaniam]

<SNIP>

Candidates’ names and curriculum vitae must be submitted by 13
February, and the Coordination Committee will meet to decide on 13-14
May. It will start with a long list and gradually winnow it down to one.

The Norwegian letter states that: “The government of every member
state of WIPO may, if it so desires, propose the name of one of its
nationals as candidate for nomination by the WIPO Coordination
Committee.” And it seems that as many are considering it.

It is somewhat unclear when Idris would make his exit, though it
appears it would be at the conclusion of the 2008 assemblies.


-----------------------------

http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=830



20 November 2007
WIPO Director’s Planned Early Departure Draws Mixed Reactions


  Add your own comment on this article

By William New
When Kamil Idris, the director general of the United Nations World
Intellectual Property Organization, informed staff last week that the
process for electing his successor would occur one year early, it was
met with mixed reactions. It also is likely to be met with a torrent
of politicking for the next DG.

Some have responded to the internal decision with declarations hailing
Idris’ honour and contribution to the organisation since he was
elected in 1997. Others, including the chair of the WIPO member state
executive body and a group of WIPO staff, have sought assurances on
his departure date and called into question other members of the staff
who have been especially close to Idris.

Idris came under fire in the past year after changing his birth date
in official WIPO records after more than two decades. The correction,
along with a variety of other mostly unproven rumours and allegations,
led some to generate doubts about his ability to govern the
organisation. Idris has not met directly with the media for years.

Sources have been careful to downplay whether there was a deal struck
between Idris and the governments that have pushed for his departure,
such as the United States, Switzerland and some in the European Union.
It is unclear what pension and severance arrangement Idris will receive.

On 13 November, Idris’s office issued an email to all WIPO staff (see
below) informing them that the process of choosing his successor would
begin soon. The Coordination Committee (the roughly 80-member
executive body) will select a candidate in May 2008 to propose for
election by the full membership at its next annual General Assemblies
in September 2008. Member states will soon be invited to submit
nominations, the message said.

The 2007 WIPO General Assemblies failed to pass a budget for the next
two years after a fight over the Idris case and over how to spend a
surplus from the past two years (IPW, WIPO, 4 October 2007).

In his note, Idris urged all concerned to approve the budget as soon
as possible. Among other things, the new budget funds large-scale new
construction expected to begin in February, and new funding was
earmarked for development-related activities.

The Group B developed countries took over the chair of the
Coordination Committee at the recent assemblies. Norway issued a
letter on behalf of the committee laying out the procedure for
selecting a new DG.

Candidates’ names and curriculum vitae must be submitted by 13
February, and the Coordination Committee will meet to decide on 13-14
May. It will start with a long list and gradually winnow it down to one.

The Norwegian letter states that: “The government of every member
state of WIPO may, if it so desires, propose the name of one of its
nationals as candidate for nomination by the WIPO Coordination
Committee.” And it seems that as many are considering it.

It is somewhat unclear when Idris would make his exit, though it
appears it would be at the conclusion of the 2008 assemblies.

US Satisfied, Africa Full of Praise

The United States, which has led the effort to remove Idris as quickly
as possible, stated its satisfaction with the decision. Warren
Tichenor, US ambassador to the UN, in a statement called the
announcement a “positive development.”

“The member states and the employees of WIPO deserve to have an
organisation that is led with the highest professional ethical
standards, and we believe that this renewal of leadership will bring
new confidence and vitality to the organisation,” he said. But a US
official said later that Idris still faces questions about the
allegations that were raised.

Idris came to Geneva decades ago from Sudan and has had public support
from the African Group at WIPO throughout the recent turbulence. The
African Union posted a news release to its website, www.african-union.org
, dated 26 October following a visit by Idris with ambassador-level
officials from the union. Idris thanked them for their support and
highlighted 11 points that he said form the core policy and programme
direction of WIPO under his leadership. He stressed the importance of
his legacy, the release said. The 11 points listed in the release
suggest a legacy of focused work on behalf of developing countries.

The 11 points are topped by the creation of a WIPO Development Agenda
(by member states); launch of discussions for a treaty on folklore,
traditional knowledge and genetic resources (again by member states);
establishment of the WIPO World Wide Academy; support for creative
industries in developing countries; establishment of a least-developed
country unit, creation of a small-and-medium-sized enterprises unit;
advice to developing countries in using flexibilities to the World
Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS) and on negotiating bilateral and regional free-
trade agreements; increased geographic representation in WIPO staff;
keeping the executive office independent; generating budget surpluses;
and finally, “ensuring that the transition of leadership in the
organisation is conducted with dignity and in conformity with extant
rules and regulations.” The latter is no small feat in the face of the
heavy pressure exerted on him to step down by the organisation’s
biggest funders.

Idris assured the Africans that “there was no crisis in the
organisation” despite media reports.

Idris’ positive impact on the organisation also was captured in
comments posted to the Intellectual Property Watch blog.

Legacy Questioned by Staff

Meanwhile, a group of WIPO staff referring to itself as Cincinnatus,
issued an open letter to Idris, posted to the Intellectual Property
Watch Inside Views column, www.ip-watch.org, questioning his legacy
and comparing his time in office to the totalitarian, spin-filled
world imagined by author George Orwell in his book “1984.”

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

———

Message From the DG:

From: Office.DG Tuesday - November 13, 2007
To: Wipo.Mail
Subject: Message from the Director General to all staff / Message du
Directeur général au personnel
Dear colleagues,

I should like to inform all staff members that I have decided to
advance the process for nominating and appointing a Director General,
based on the Procedures for the Nomination and Appointment of
Directors General of WIPO, adopted by the General Assembly of WIPO in
September 1998.

Following discussions with the Chairs of the General Assembly and of
the Coordination Committee, we will shortly be issuing a circular
inviting WIPO Member States to nominate for consideration by the
Coordination Committee in May 2008, candidates for appointment by the
General Assembly at its next session in September 2008.

With regard to the 2008/2009 Program and Budget recommended for
approval by the Program and Budget Committee to the Assemblies of
Member States of WIPO in 2007, the Chair of the General Assembly will
continue his consultations with group coordinators and will meet in
two weeks to consider this important issue. I have personally urged
all concerned, in the best interests of the Organization, to proceed
soon with the formal approval of the 2008/2009 Program and Budget.

In the interim, I should like to thank all of you for your continued
support and diligence. As I have repeatedly said, the Organization’s
strongest asset is its staff members. I look forward to your continued
collaboration and do appreciate your many efforts and hard work.

Thank you.