[Ip-health] House Dems Announcement of GAO Report on Drug Development
Mike Palmedo
mike_palmedo@yahoo.com
Wed Dec 20 14:03:49 2006
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Fact Sheet on Drug Development
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20061219112943-24453.pdf
GAO Report on New Drug Development
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20061219094529-73424.pdf
Press Release
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20061219111733-59654.pdf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/story.asp?ID=3D1148
GAO Analysis Refutes Industry Myths About Drug Development
House Committee on Government Reform (Democrats)
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Rep. Waxman, along with Sens. Durbin and Kennedy, today released a new
GAO analysis revealing a decline in new drug development by the
pharmaceutical industry. The report contradicts the myth that higher
research expenditures have resulted in more treatment options for patients=
.
* Research breakthroughs have failed to keep up with R&D funding.
Between 1993 and 2004, pharmaceutical R&D expenses increased from $16
billion to almost $40 billion, a 147% increase. Over the same time
period, the number of new drug applications (NDAs) has increased by only
3 8 %, and the number of applications for potential breakthrough drugs
(new molecular entities, or NMEs) has increased by only 7%. In both
cases, the number of applications has declined since 1999.
* The majority of drug applications are for non-breakthrough drugs. Only
32% of drug applications are for NMEs; only 12% of drug applications are
considered by FDA to be =93priority=94 NMEs.
* Patent law loopholes discourage innovation. The ability of drug
manufacturers to easily obtain patents for minor changes to products, or
to receive patent exclusivity for new uses of existing products, have
reduced incentives to develop new drugs.
The panel of experts convened by GAO recommended increased collaboration
among government, industry, and academia in the drug development proces
and in the development of scientists who can translate scientific
breakthroughs into practical results . The panel also indicated that the
government could consider provid ing additional financial incentives =97
such as longer patent lives for innovative drugs and shorter patent
terms for =93me-too=94 drugs =97 to shape the drug development process.