[Ip-health] MSF Open Letter to Central American Negotiators -- IP and access to meds in
CAFTA
Rachel COHEN
Rachel.COHEN@newyork.msf.org
Tue Oct 21 16:25:02 2003
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
This open letter was sent to Central American negotiators of CAFTA today.=
=0D
For a hard copy of this letter (with footnotes) and/or a copy of the letter=
=0D
sent to USTR last week, please do not hesitate to contact me.=0D
=0D
Rachel=0D
=0D
=0D
Rachel M. Cohen=0D
U.S. Director, Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines=0D
Doctors Without Borders/M=C3=A9decins Sans Fronti=C3=A8res (MSF)=0D
333 Seventh Avenue, 2nd Floor * New York, NY * 10001-5004 * USA=0D
Tel: +1-212-655-3762=0D
Mobile: +1-917-331-9077=0D
Fax: +1-212-679-7016=0D
E-mail: rachel.cohen@newyork.msf.org=0D
=0D
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/=0D
http://www.accessmed-msf.org/=0D
________________________=0D
=0D
OPEN LETTER TO CENTRAL AMERICAN NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING INTELLECTUAL=0D
PROPERTY AND ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN THE US-CENTRAL AMERICAN FREE TRADE=0D
AGREEMENT (CAFTA)=0D
=0D
October 21, 2003=0D
=0D
Alberto Trejos Norman Garc=C3=ADa=0D
Minister of Trade Minister of Economy=0D
Apartado 96-205 5ave, 4ta Calle,=0D
Edificio Salame=0D
San Jos=C3=A9, Costa Rica Tegucigalpa, Honduras=0D
=0D
Miguel Lacayo Mario Arana=0D
Minister of Economy Minister of Industry and Trade=
=0D
Alameda Juan Pablo II y Calle Guadelupe Km 6 Carretera a=
=0D
Masaya =E2=80=93 Frente al Camino de Oriente=0D
Edificio C1-C2 Managua, Nicaragua=0D
Centro de Gobierno=0D
San Salvador, El Salvador=0D
=0D
Patricia Ramirez Ceberg=0D
Minister of Economy=0D
8va, Avenida 10-43, Zona l=0D
01001 Guatemala=0D
=0D
Dear Sirs and Madam,=0D
=0D
We are writing on behalf of Doctors Without Borders/M=C3=A9decins Sans=0D
Frontier=C3=A8s (MSF) on the occasion of the Houston round of negotiations =
of=0D
the US-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) to raise our concerns=
=0D
about the potential negative consequences of this agreement on access to=0D
essential medicines in Central American countries. MSF has good reason to=
=0D
believe that provisions in CAFTA related to intellectual property (IP)=0D
protection may result in needless suffering and death for our patients and=
=0D
millions of other people in the region with HIV/AIDS and other diseases,=0D
and undermine the historic World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial=0D
Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (=E2=80=9CDoha Declara=
tion=E2=80=9D).=0D
=0D
In an open letter to the United States Trade Representative (USTR) dated=0D
October 15, 2003 (please see attachment/enclosure), MSF called upon the US=
=0D
to immediately make the CAFTA text available publicly; abandon efforts to=
=0D
push TRIPS-plus proposals in CAFTA and other regional and bilateral trade=
=0D
agreements such as the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) agreement;=0D
and uphold the Doha Declaration by explicitly supporting Central American=
=0D
countries in fully implementing the Doha Declaration. Today, we call upon=
=0D
you to uphold your right and obligation to protect public health and=0D
promote access to medicines by making use of the flexibilities in the TRIPS=
=0D
agreement, which were reaffirmed in Doha, and oppose TRIPS-plus proposals=
=0D
in CAFTA negotiations.=0D
=0D
SUMMARY OF CONCERNS WITH IP PROVISIONS IN CAFTA=0D
=0D
The draft text of CAFTA has not been made public, so it is impossible to=0D
provide an informed analysis of the IP provisions proposed in the=0D
agreement. However, IP provisions in other bilateral free trade agreement=
=0D
(e.g. the US-Singapore agreement) are clearly TRIPS-plus, and these are=0D
consistent with proposed provisions in the Free Trade Area of the Americas=
=0D
(FTAA) agreement. As we have related in earlier correspondences, MSF has=
=0D
called upon all countries in the Americas to exclude IP provisions from the=
=0D
FTAA agreement altogether, as this will be the only way to guarantee that=
=0D
countries in the region can uphold the commitment they made in Doha to=0D
ensure the protection of public health and the promotion of access to=0D
medicines for all. Based on USTR=E2=80=99s negotiating objectives in numer=
ous=0D
bilateral and regional agreements, we feel it is safe to assume that=0D
similar provisions are proposed in CAFTA.=0D
=0D
We have communicated our concerns about the draft IP Chapter of the FTAA to=
=0D
FTAA negotiators and to the FTAA Committee of Government Representatives on=
=0D
the Participation of Civil Society on numerous occasions over the past two=
=0D
years. To reiterate, MSF is concerned that the proposals would:=0D
=0D
1. Dramatically limit the circumstances under which compulsory licenses on=
=0D
pharmaceuticals may be issued;=0D
2. Extend patent terms on pharmaceuticals beyond the 20-year minimum in=0D
TRIPS;=0D
3. Confer abusive powers to regulatory authorities to enforce patents; and=
=0D
4. Grant exclusive rights over pharmaceutical data (data exclusivity).=0D
=0D
Each of these proposals would have the effect of limiting generic=0D
competition, which has been one of the most important, reliable, and=0D
powerful forces to reduce drug prices systematically in Central America and=
=0D
other developing regions, making essential, life-saving medicines such as=
=0D
antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the treatment of HIV/AIDS more affordable for=0D
individuals and the health systems that serve them.=0D
=0D
WHAT IS AT STAKE: THE EXAMPLE OF AIDS IN GUATEMALA=0D
=0D
MSF currently has projects in three of the five CAFTA countries=E2=80=94Hon=
duras,=0D
Guatemala, and Nicaragua=E2=80=94providing medical care for people living w=
ith=0D
HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), people with=0D
Chagas=E2=80=99 disease, displaced and homeless populations, including stre=
et=0D
children, and indigenous people. Our concerns about the effects of patents=
=0D
on the price and availability of essential, life-saving medicines are well=
=0D
known to USTR, and need not be reiterated here. However, even where there=
=0D
are no patent barriers, TRIPS-plus provisions will effectively delay=0D
generic competition and limit access to affordable medicines. We would=0D
like to focus particular attention on one such proposal: data exclusivity.=
=0D
=0D
Although the TRIPS Agreement only requires WTO Members to protect clinical=
=0D
information that is generally required by drug regulatory authorities to=0D
approve the marketing of a new medicine (=E2=80=9Cundisclosed test or data=
=E2=80=9D)=0D
against =E2=80=9Cunfair commercial use=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cdisclosure=E2=
=80=9D in the framework of unfair=0D
competition law, US negotiating objectives include grant of exclusive=0D
rights on these data for at least five years. Since generic companies rely=
=0D
on pharmaceutical test data to demonstrate that their products are safe and=
=0D
effective, data exclusivity will significantly delay the introduction of=0D
generics even when there are no patent barriers.=0D
=0D
In Guatemala, 67,000 people are living with HIV/AIDS. MSF currently=0D
provides antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for over 600 people in hospitals in=
=0D
Guatemala City and Coatepeque, and plans to double the number of patients=
=0D
on treatment next year. Since ARVs are not protected by patents in=0D
Guatemala, MSF is able to use generic ARVs in its programs. Just one year=
=0D
ago, MSF was able to pay between 75% and 99% less for generics than the=0D
government of Guatemala paid for originator drugs. For example, the price=
=0D
of the ARV d4T (40mg) from Bristol-Myers Squibb was $5,271 per person per=
=0D
year compared with just $53 per person per year from a generic=0D
manufacturer. Although the prices of originator ARVs have fallen=0D
dramatically in the past year due to generic competition, they are still on=
=0D
average two to five times as expensive as quality generic equivalents, with=
=0D
treatment from originator companies costing on average $320-800 per month.=
=0D
Such a price differential still means less people receive treatment, as the=
=0D
average income in Guatemala is $160 per month.=0D
=0D
In April 2003, under pressure to adopt US standards for protection of=0D
pharmaceutical test data, the Guatemalan government modified its national=
=0D
IP bill by passing a decree, which gives originator pharmaceutical=0D
companies five years of exclusivity on these data. This will have the=0D
effect of delaying generic competition=E2=80=94even where there are no pate=
nt=0D
barriers=E2=80=94for five years. For thousands of Guatemalans living with=
=0D
HIV/AIDS, five years without access to affordable ARVs can be the=0D
difference between life and death. As it stands, Guatemala is the only=0D
country in Central America that gives five years of exclusive protection=0D
for test data, but we worry that CAFTA threatens to extend such a provision=
=0D
to all parties to the CAFTA negotiations.=0D
=0D
CONCLUSION=0D
=0D
The promise of Doha is that the TRIPS Agreement can and should be=0D
interpreted and implemented in a manner =E2=80=9Csupportive of WTO members'=
right=0D
to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines=
=0D
for all.=E2=80=9D TRIPS-plus proposals in CAFTA threaten to make it impossi=
ble for=0D
countries in Central America to exercise the rights re-confirmed in Doha.=
=0D
As a medical humanitarian organization, we cannot accept the subordination=
=0D
of the health needs of our patients and millions of others to US trade=0D
interests. The US must not hamper the ability of countries in the region=
=0D
to fully implement the Doha Declaration, and should instead support them=0D
explicitly in doing so. In order to ensure the protection of public health=
=0D
and the promotion of access to medicines, the Doha Declaration must be the=
=0D
ceiling for CAFTA and other regional and bilateral agreements.=0D
=0D
=0D
Sincerely,=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
Nicolas de Torrente Luis Villa, MD=0D
Executive Director, MSF USA Head of Mission,=
=0D
MSF Guatemala=0D
=0D
=0D
cc: FTAA negotiators