[Ip-health] Canada and Para 6 Solution
ds20@uow.edu.au
ds20@uow.edu.au
Mon Oct 20 11:29:34 2003
Canada and Para 6 solution=0D
I had mentioned in my previous note about limitations of=0D
Canadian sovereignty which limits its capacities to take any=0D
independent decisions. While Richard Elliott has been trying=0D
to give push to the supposed changes in the Canadian Patent=0D
act but the influence of the USTR on the Canadian decision=0D
making is so pervasive is that anything Canada does will just=0D
be one phone call away. No wonder recent newspaper reports=0D
have started saying that the USA may restrict the scope of=0D
the Canadian Patent act changes to only selected diseases=0D
which the USA throughout insisted on. This is the worst=0D
developments of the Free-Trade Areas the USA has entered=0D
into, that the non-USA countries have become agents for the=0D
USTR. We have example of Edourado Perez Motta from Mexico=0D
working as an agent for the USA where he pushed Article 31=0D
solution for Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. We have=0D
also the example of a Canadian (I am forgetting his name) who=0D
as Chairman of the General council did his bit to push=0D
Article 31 solution of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration.=0D
We have seen the role played by Gopalan, the TRIPS Council=0D
present Chairman from Singapore in pushing the Article 31=0D
Solution of the Doha Declaration. The Singapore export has=0D
shown significant improvement this quarter thanks to increase=0D
in exports in pharmaceutical products from Merck=E2=80=99s. Find out=0D
the import content of the Merck=E2=80=99s exports. The most recent=0D
one is that of the Cancun Ministerial Meet where another=0D
Mexican gentleman pushed the agenda for the USA forcing=0D
developing countries to walk off the meeting but having seen=0D
the developments leading to illegal Para 6 solution of 30th=0D
August 2003, these gentlemen from developing world would sign=0D
something without letting their people know why they have=0D
signed those documents. The net conclusion is that the whole=0D
development in Canada is nothing to look forward to. You need=0D
independent nations to take decision for welfare of the=0D
international community.=0D
Daya Shanker=0D