[Hague-jur-commercial-law] Contracts that restrain competition or
impede the transfer of technology
Michael Sondow
msondow@iciiu.org
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:34:42 -0500
James Love wrote:
> CPTech is concerned that the proposed Hague Convention on
> Jurisdiction has been repositioned to introduce sweeping
> changes in international contract law, making nearly all
> contractual choice of court provisions automatic and
> enforceable, undermining national discretion on a number of
> sensitive and controversial policy issues. This, combined
> with the very strong provisions regarding enforcement of
> foreign judgments is a recipe for a new round of bold forum
> shopping.
You can say that again! The Convention has become a give-away to
multinationals. There's nothing in it at all that protects the myriad of
small and medium-sized businesses that have to deal with cross-border
trade, much less consumers who will never be able to afford foreign
litigation. This so-called convention is nothing more than a revision of
international law by the corporate lawyers of the American Bar
Association and their brethren across the globe.
M. Sondow
=================================================================
"Lawyers come to think of administrative law and the
administrative process as significant and worthy of study
only in those areas where private interests think it worth
their while to demand protection. As a consequence lawyers
seeking for their clients elaborate procedural protection
modeled on the judicial process may, in an excess of
generalizing zeal, induce legislatures, administrative
agencies, and courts to extend such procedures into areas
where they are alien and inappropriate."
-- Jaffe & Nathanson, "Administrative Law"
=================================================================
International Congress of Independent Internet Users (ICIIU)
iciiu@iciiu.org
=================================================================