[Hague-jur-commercial-law] Mark your calendar: IP& The HagueMarch 29-30 at USPTO

[sarah.b.deutsch@verizon.com]

This loops back to the issues raised by Art 5, which
states that even if the parties enter into a choice of court agreement for
one country, another country's courts CANNOT dismiss an enforcement action
brought in that country unless giving effect to the agreement would lead to
a "very serious injustice or would be manifestly contrary to fundamental
principles of public policy".


Sarah B. Deutsch
Vice President & Associate General Counsel
Verizon Communications
Phone: 703-351-3044
Fax:      703-351-3670
sarah.b.deutsch@verizon.com




|---------+--------------------------------------------------->
|         |           "Richard Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>        |
|         |           Sent by:                                |
|         |           hague-jur-commercial-law-admin@venice.es|
|         |           sential.org                             |
|         |                                                   |
|         |                                                   |
|         |           03/10/2004 01:43 PM                     |
|         |           Please respond to rms                   |
|         |                                                   |
|---------+--------------------------------------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                              |
  |       To:       "Michael Sondow" <msondow@iciiu.org>                                         |
  |       cc:       hague-jur-commercial-law@venice.essential.org                                |
  |       Subject:  Re: [Hague-jur-commercial-law] Mark your calendar: IP& The HagueMarch 29-30  |
  |        at USPTO                                                                              |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




    Manon Ress wrote:

    > Article 6 implies that interim relief may be sought from any
    > court anywhere.

Does it imply that interim relief obtained in country A must be
supported by country B?  If not, how is this a change from the
present?
_______________________________________________
Hague-jur-commercial-law mailing list
Hague-jur-commercial-law@lists.essential.org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/hague-jur-commercial-law