[Ecommerce] FTA condition on quota will kill Korean film industry

[Manon Ress]

Why would anyone want that (except of course Bonnie Richardson/ MPAA)?

In a strange & sad twist, the principle underlying cultural
exceptions that was evoked by the US back in the 1950s (when the US
adhered to the first multilateral treaty of cultural goods, the
Florence Agreement), is being denounced now by the US in the context
of the US/Korea free trade agreement.  Let's hope the Korean film
industry and the public can push back because the world will be
pretty boring if we can only watch hollywood movies all over the world.
Manon
PS
more on cultural exceptions and the GATT agreement at:
http://www.unesco.org/culture/industries/trade/html_eng/
question17.shtml#17.


http://theseoultimes.com/ST/?url=3D/ST/db/read.php?idx=3D1234

South Korea's Battle with Hollywood
By Andrew Salmon
Staff Writer

With a mix of gangster thrillers, cold war morality tales, quirky
comedies and art house flicks, South Korean films are garnering
critical acclaim and commercial success at home, across Asia and,
increasingly, around the world.

But behind the scenes a bitter struggle is being waged.

In recent years, local producers have been battling to maintain a
system that reserves 40 percent of South Korean screens for domestic
productions. They say the system protects the domestic film industry
from the Hollywood juggernaut, but the U.S. film industry says it is
a violation of fair trade practices.

Now, with South Korea actively pursuing an investment treaty with the
United States, a showdown is approaching. Many, including the U.S.
ambassador, Christopher Hill, have publicly asked why the system is
necessary, given the recent strength of Korean movies.

This year, the director Park Chan-Wook's Tarantino-esque thriller
"Old Boy" won the Grand Prix at the Cannes Film Festival, while the
art house director Kim Ki-Duk garnered best director awards at both
the Venice and Berlin film festivals.

In a nation of 48 million, the Cold War thriller "Silmido," based on
the true story of a commando unit trained to assassinate the North
Korean leader Kim Il-Sung, this year became the first domestic movie
to crack the 10 million viewer mark. Its record was broken months
later by "Taegukgi: Brotherhood of War," a melodrama submitted to the
U.S. Academy Awards.
.
The industry's renaissance dates to the mid-1990s.

"In the early 1990s, Koreans were first allowed to travel abroad, so
by the late 1990s, you had these filmmakers coming back from film
schools in the United States, with a sense of world cinema and world-
class production values," said Mark Russell, who covers Korean film
for The Hollywood Reporter. During the 1997-98 financial crisis, "a
lot of film production companies exited the market, so to fill the
void, you had younger people trying different things."

Local films' share of the South Korean box office rose from 48
percent in 2002 to 49 percent in 2003 and to 62 percent for the first
half of 2004, according to the Korean Film Council. Domestically,
Korean films' earnings at the box office last year were $644 million,
the council said, while revenue from local films screened abroad was
also on the rise, hitting $32 million for the first six months of
2004, compared with $31 million for all of 2003.

But despite recent successes, the so-called screen quota system,
introduced in 1966, continues to mandate the showing of South Korean
films for 146 days a year in local theaters. With foreign films'
market share falling, Hollywood has taken notice.

"Screen quotas harm local cinema owners by forcing them to play to
empty theaters without helping local film producers, since no quota
can force audiences to buy tickets to films they don't find
attractive," said Bonnie Richardson, vice president for trade and
federal affairs at the Motion Picture Association of America. The
association wants the quota reduced and has been lobbying the U.S.
Congress, the U.S. trade representative and the U.S. State and
Commerce departments to that effect since 1996.

So far, Hollywood has made little progress. Since Hill arrived as
ambassador in August, however, trade issues have come to the fore,
and the U.S. side insists that the screen quota issue be resolved
before free trade negotiations can begin in earnest.

A new free trade deal "is on everyone's agenda now," said Tami
Overby, executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce
in Korea.

"I know President Roh has said the quota must go, key ministers are
in favor, and the polls I have seen suggest 60 percent of the public
are in favor of its reduction or elimination."

Many in the South Korean film industry, however, are not budging.

"We are afraid the current success of our industry could be
temporary," said Jonathan Kim, chairman of the Korea Film Producers
Association and president of the film production company Hanmac,
which made "Silmido."

"We don't want to be like Hong Kong, where they had a boom and are
now in a bust," Kim said. When asked why the industry could not now
stand on its own two feet, he used this comparison: "If you have a
road crossing where there are a lot of accidents, you put a stop
light there. If accidents are reduced, do you take the light away?"

Kim's views are not shared by the government, which wants more U.S.
investment.

"The domestic film industry has improved, and homegrown films need to
start competing with Hollywood films," the Korea Fair Trade
Commission said in October.

Even the Korean Ministry of Culture and Tourism, a champion of the
sector, sees change as inevitable. "Since September, we have been
talking with the industry," said Lee Jung Woo of the ministry's film
division. "The timing has not yet been decided, but we will try to
suggest a plan within this year," he said. Past moves to adjust the
quota have faced fierce resistance, with famed directors shaving
their heads and stars protesting in the streets. This may not work
again.

"It's hard to get people fired up when the industry is so
successful," Russell of The Hollywood Reporter said.

This time, the film industry seems likely to take a more thoughtful
approach to the battle.

"Korea's screen quota system bears international significance in that
it sets a good example to other countries by proving the benefits one
good cultural policy can bring to a country," the Coalition for
Cultural Diversity in Moving Images, a South Korean industry-financed
group established in 1993, said in June.

The stance of South Korean filmmakers indicates that they now see
themselves as the inheritor of the mantle of cultural protectionism,
a mantle worn first =97 and most prominently =97 by the French film
industry, which, in global trade negotiations in the early 1990s,
pioneered the concept of a "cultural exception" for arts products.

"There is symbolism involved: we are the leading country keeping
culture out of trade talks, so if we give up the quota, the United
States will go to other countries and say, 'Look, they gave up,"'
added Kim of the film producers' group. "The shaved-head days are
over. We need to educate people. We don't think a free trade
agreement would help our economy, and we need to keep our culture.
Culture is sovereignty."

This argument does not wash with Hollywood. "We understand that film
is a reflection of the societies and cultures that create them,"
Richardson said. "However, we encourage societies to choose policy
tools that encourage the competitiveness of their local industry,
such as support for training or tax incentives, rather than
protectionist tools that restrict our access to the market but do
little to boost the competitiveness of the local industry."

Kim, however, refuses to give ground.

"I don't think the quota will ever be ready to be cut," he said.
"This fight will go on to the next generation."


The above article is from The International Herald Tribune.

************************************************
Manon Anne Ress
manon.ress@cptech.org,
www.cptech.org

Consumer Project on Technology
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA
Tel.:  +1.202.332.2670, Ext 16 Fax: +1.202.332.2673

Consumer Project on Technology
1 Route des  Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 791 6727

Consumer Project on Technology
24 Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX, UK
Tel: +44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252 Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607