[Ecommerce] UN report to leave ICANN’s balls intact
Michelle Childs
michelle.childs@cptech.org
Thu Jul 14 05:49:00 2005
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/13/icann_conference/
UN report to leave ICANN’s balls intact
By Kieren McCarthy
Published Wednesday 13th July 2005 14:37 GMT
A sneak preview of the UN’s report into internet governance has revealed
that ICANN will retain its position as the lead technical body for the
Internet. However, the organisation’s dreams of becoming a
quasi-governmental body overseeing the future of the internet have been
dealt a heavy blow.
Chairman of the UN’s Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG), Nitin
Desai, spoke at ICANN’s bi-annual conference in Luxembourg this morning
and said that 70 to 80 per cent of Internet governance did not concern
ICANN at all.
He highlighted the threats of cybercrime and spam as examples of where a
broader forum, including existing international organisations such as the
UN, would be making the key decisions.
He also outlined a brand new forum in which ICANN would play a role
alongside other major players such as WIPO and the ITU. That forum would
not have decision-making powers but would supply a single source of
authoritative advice to the UN.
The news has not come as a surprise to ICANN with insiders saying the
report - which should be published on Friday and officially handed over to
Kofi Annan on Monday - was pretty much what they expected.
The report, while outlining that the “names and numbers” of the internet
will be almost exclusively left under ICANN’s control, gives four
scenarios for the wider public policy issues thrown up by the internet.
Head of the report Markus Kummer told those assembled these ranged from
“status quo plus” up to heavy government involvement.
The report, after a period of public comment, will go to a Prep-Com3
conference in Geneva in September and finally end up at the World Summit
on the Information Society (WSIS) in Tunis in November, where the world’s
governments will decide how they wish the future of the Internet to
proceed.
After the meeting, Nitin Desai told The Register that it was simply a
matter of things having changed. “The system is changing. It is no longer
just a technical or academic network. But the scientists’ culture has
remained and that somewhat anarchic approach no longer works. There are
over a billion people using the system now. You can’t expect governments
to just stand there.”
Desai provided other examples of where the internet has stretched far
beyond the original approach taken by technologists across the globe.
“Many standards are now created by commercial companies. Look at the music
industry - that has been completely changed by the Internet - and maybe
soon the film industry will be too. I don’t care about the system working
behind the Internet because I just type what I want into Google. Search
engines are replacing the DNS function in that sense.”
However, the process itself has been a great success, he explained.
“People are less suspicious of each other. And governments have learnt
that they should not get involved in technical and operational matters.
Again, the main concerns are things like cybercrime and spam - none of
these are to do with names and address.”
As for the recent statement by the US government that it intended to
maintain control of the root zone file, Mr Desai was careful to avoid
inflaming the situation. “What we have to look at is the internet of five
years’ into the future. I do not expect to see this [root zone file
ownership] resolved soon. But before now the US government has exercised
its responsibility fairly. I have no criticism of what has happened in the
past. It did so much earlier helping to build the infrastructure.”
The big push, in Desai’s mind, is to extend the internet to the world,
rather than focus on the already sophisticated system in the West. “The
growth from now on will be in developing countries -where English is not
the first language, not even the second.”
But the "great advantage" to the Internet is its universalism, Mr Desai
said, so it looks as though ICANN need not worry about its future.
Paul Kane of CENTR, an organisation that represents many of the world's
top-level domains was pleased with the news. "I am delighted to hear that
the WGIG committee has recognised that ICANN should focus on its core
technical functions of names and numbers, and leave the public policy
processes to wider international discussion groups," he told us. "This is
something we have been arguing for for years."
And so it seems that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers - our old friend ICANN - is going to do exactly what it says on
the tin.®
--
Michelle Childs -Head of European Affairs
Consumer Project on Technology in London
24, Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX,UK.
Tel:+44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252.
Mob:+44(0)790 386 4642. Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607
http://www.cptech.org
Consumer Project on Technology in Washington, DC
PO Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036, USA
Tel.: 1.202.387.8030, fax: 1.202.234.5176
Consumer Project on Technology in Geneva
1 Route des Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 791 6727