[Ecommerce] FYI: US Comments on March 21 WSIS Draft Declaration and Action Plan
Manon Anne Ress
manon.ress@cptech.org
Fri May 30 13:17:00 2003
The U.S. Contribution to the WSIS can be found at
http://www.state.gov/e/eb/cip/wsis/ under key documents. It will also be
posted to the WSIS website shortly as document 47.
For now:
http://www.state.gov/e/eb/cip/wsis/c8160.htm
Cut and paste:
United States of America Comments on the March 21st Version of the WSIS
Draft Declaration and Action Plan
May 29, 2003
Introduction
In Resolution 56/183 the United Nations (UN) General Assembly endorsed
the framework established by the International Telecommunication Union
(ITU) to convene a World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).
Resolution 56/183 specifically acknowledges the need for leaders at the
highest political levels to ?marshal the global consensus and commitment
required to promote the urgently needed access of all countries to
information, knowledge and communication technologies for development so
as to reap the full benefits of the information and communication
technologies revolution.? The United States of America supports this
objective and sees the discussions underway in the WSIS preparatory
process as a complement to and continuation of the ongoing global
dialogue in a variety of international and regional fora including the
ITU, UNESCO, WIPO, Council of Europe and other international
organizations as well as in the Inter-American Commission on
Telecommunications (CITEL), the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD), and the forum for Asia Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC). Actions adopted by the WSIS should not duplicate or
undermine well-established, consensus work in these and other fora.
General Comments
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) play a critical role
in sustainable economic and social development. Access to information
requires an environment that promotes the creation of knowledge and
ideas. The realization of the digital opportunities afforded by the
information society can contribute to a better life for all citizens
through the promotion of democracy, transparency, accountability and
good governance. The United States urges participants to use this unique
opportunity to reaffirm and implement Article 19 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights that recognizes the right of each individual
to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and
regardless of frontiers. All of these points should be clearly captured
in the common vision put forth by the WSIS.
While it is important to exchange views on the variety of applications
supported by the information society, it is essential to first ensure
that the fundamental building blocks are in place. First, the WSIS
should encourage governments to focus on creating, within their own
nations, the appropriate legal, regulatory, and policy environment that
encourages privatization, competition, liberalization and intellectual
property protection and enforcement. The development of and access to
basic telecommunication services and content is the next step. A truly
global information society will be based on the development of local
content and the freedom of individuals to access the culture of their
choosing in the language of their choosing. Finally, ensuring confidence
and security in the use of these networks is essential to building a
global information society.
Harnessing the power of the information society requires the active
participation of all stakeholders ? governments, the private sector and
civil society. In particular, the role of the private sector as the
driver of innovation and the essential nature of private investment in
the development of the world?s communications and information networks
and facilities is critical. As such, the United States suggests that the
documents emphasize the role of the private sector and the value of
competition.
The United States directs its comments to the specific thematic
principles as referenced in the draft Declaration of Principles and
draft Plan of Action:
1) Information and communication infrastructure
Without an adequate infrastructure at the local and national levels, it
is impossible for our citizens to fully interact in the global
information society. The WSIS draft Declaration of Principles and draft
Plan of Action currently assign insufficient weight and prioritization
to the vital roles of private investment and competition to the
development, deployment, maintenance, and modernization of the world?s
communications and information networks and facilities. A high priority
must be placed on the need for national policies and international
principles that promote investment, innovation and competition - all key
elements to expanding information flows and promoting the build-out of
communication infrastructure throughout the world. New technologies,
fostered by a pro-competitive marketplace, hold the promise of driving
down consumer costs and stimulating technical and market innovation. We
believe that implementing clear and effective policies, good governance,
and private sector investment, are keys to the growth of information and
communication infrastructure.
2) Access to information and knowledge
The United States agrees that a knowledge-based society depends upon
access to and availability of information, based on the principle of
free flow of information and news. Information will come from a wide
variety of sources ? public and private, commercial and non-commercial,
proprietary and public domain. Scientific progress depends upon the
availability of data so that scientists may replicate and verify results
and build upon existing knowledge. The Declaration of Principles and
Plan of Action must recognize intellectual property as a vital component
of the Information Society. Existing international intellectual property
agreements provide a valuable mechanism through which to protect
intellectual investment and encourage the creation and dissemination of
works. These agreements encompass and reflect a balance between the
interests of owners and users of intellectual property. Indeed, this
balance is struck so that owners and creators are encouraged to develop
and disseminate their works to the public for broader use.
Market conditions have led to the development and expansion of Internet
infrastructure and services. The United States believes that Internet
infrastructure and services should be market-driven and that Internet
interconnection agreements should continue to be negotiated on a
private, commercial basis. We object to the statement ?guidelines on
Internet contracts should be established and existing contracts for
Internet traffic renegotiated? (paragraph 15 of the draft Action Plan).
It is important to draw a distinction between open source software and
open standards. The WSIS documents currently discuss the two issues in a
manner that creates confusion. Open standards generally refer to
technical standards or specifications that are developed through a
well-defined process. Open standards can improve interoperability and
may facilitate interactions ranging from information exchange to
international trade, thus fostering market competition. Because of these
benefits, the use of open standards is encouraged whenever practicable.
Open source software is a term used to describe software that is
intended to be openly distributable, under a variety of different
licensing arrangements. The United States recognizes that open source
software can contribute to increased access and diversity of choice but
it is only one of many possible models for the development of software.
The WSIS documents should not promote one over the other (i.e. open
source vs. proprietary), but should instead foster the availability of
diverse alternatives and the freedom to choose among those alternatives.
In short, the WSIS should remain neutral with respect to different
technologies and modes of technology development.
The United States believes that the WSIS should affirm the right of all
individuals to freedom of opinion and expression, including freedom to
hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers, as set
forth in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
We believe that the WSIS draft Declaration of Principles and draft Plan
of Action should refer to these rights as stated in the Universal
Declaration. Rather than seeking to create additional rights at the
WSIS, States should implement the obligations that they have assumed
under human rights treaties. In this vein, we believe that individuals
should have the freedom to communicate, access information and pursue
development. Furthermore, the U.S. supports equitable access to ICT for
women, youth, remote populations, and persons with disabilities.
3) The role of governments, the business sector and civil society in the
promotion of ICTs for development
The U.S. supports a prominent role for the private sector and civil
society at the WSIS, as envisioned in UNGA Resolution 56/182. The
private sector is the primary investor in, and innovator of,
infrastructure, products, content, and services. The views of civil
society represent the disparate views of a variety of information
society participants and need to be carefully integrated into national,
regional and international development strategies. All governments
should strengthen public institutions by facilitating the development of
necessary infrastructure and by promoting transparency, accountability
and fair administrative and judicial institutions. The WSIS should
recognize that an environment that encourages public-private
partnerships is essential to ensuring a sustainable information society.
4) Capacity building
The development of the information society depends on achieving basic
education for all, including ICT literacy and workforce skills. Without
the necessary literacy, education, and training, individuals will not be
able to use available infrastructure and ICT to realize their human
potential ? and will not be able to access the larger world that
composes the information society. Optimizing the use of technology can
contribute to educational development. We should encourage schools to
serve as community technology centers in order that persons can take
advantage of their ICT resources. Therefore, the WSIS should acknowledge
existing capacity building exercises underway at the national, regional,
and international levels. Particular emphasis should be placed on the
need to not only educate users but also policy makers and regulators.
Furthermore, we believe it is beneficial for WSIS to harness volunteers
to help educate businesses and entrepreneurs with the ICT skills and
knowledge to operate more efficiently and to compete in the global economy.
5) Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Security of, and confidence in, ICT infrastructures are essential if the
economic and social benefits of these technologies are to be achieved.
Security requires action by all countries to prevent malicious activity
and defend cyberspace through national action and cross border
cooperation. The WSIS should endorse a global approach to cybersecurity
rather than urging the creation of a global instrument on this topic.
The WSIS should promote the adoption of effective substantive and
procedural laws to counteract electronic crime; prevention of and
defense against threats to cyber infrastructures; encouragement of
information-sharing regarding computer emergency response; and support
for existing international and regional mechanisms. In addition, WSIS
should encourage all participants in ICT networks (governments,
businesses, other organizations and individual users who develop, own,
provide, manage, service and use ICT systems and networks) to join
together to raise awareness of network security and to create a global
culture of cybersecurity.
6) Enabling environment
To maximize the economic and social benefits of the Information Society,
it is critical for all stakeholders to work together to create a clear,
market-based, legal framework and supportive policy environment, capable
of promoting technological innovation and competition, thus favoring
investment in infrastructure and development of new services. This
policy framework should promote competition, increased trade
liberalization and private sector investment, including adherence to the
WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement, and support the
private, commercial negotiation of Internet interconnection agreements.
Countries should adhere to and fully implement existing multilateral,
regional and bilateral agreements regarding intellectual property
protection such as the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights and the 1996 WIPO Copyright Treaty and
Performances and Phonograms Treaty treaties concerning copyright and
related rights. In addition, the management of the Internet domain name
and address system should take place via a public-private partnership
that operates in an open and transparent manner to preserve and enhance
the necessary global interoperability and coordination of the Internet's
unique identifier system while recognizing its technical limitations and
requirements.
7) ICT applications
The information society is dependent upon the ubiquitous deployment of
ICT networks and access to the variety of applications that can enhance
all aspects of our daily lives. The WSIS should highlight the promise
that applications such as e-government, e-health, e-commerce, and
e-learning hold, while also recognizing that there is no
one-size-fits-all solution to the myriad of development challenges
facing each country. ICTs offer tremendous potential to advance
education through distance learning programs, teacher training, and
access for teachers and students alike to the vast pools of information
and knowledge. ICTs provide businesses and entrepreneurs access to new
national, regional and global markets and also create opportunities for
training in modern business skills. E-government offers new
possibilities for re-defining the relationship between government and
the citizenry it serves. E-health services may serve to facilitate
access to health care information and services. We note that Article 25
of the UDHR states ?everyone has the right to a standard of living
adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family,
including ? medical care?.?. We support the freedom of everyone to seek
healthcare services and information. However, the United States
disagrees with the statement that ?access to healthcare information and
services is a basic right,? which goes beyond rights established under
existing human rights treaties.
8) Cultural identity and linguistic diversity, local content and media
development
Cultural diversity requires the free flow of information and content in
cultures and languages of individuals? choosing. It is important for
governments to sustain an environment that does not deny individuals
free choice of contemporary cultural products or language. Attempts to
restrict or legislate against specific cultures or languages would
create an artificial barrier against cultural growth and cultural
pluralism. The broad dissemination of content from all cultures and
languages must be preserved. Governments that choose to support the
development of local content in local languages for dissemination
through ICTs should recognize the importance that intellectual property
rights play in such development, and should ensure that their citizens
can benefit from an effective intellectual property regime.
9) Ethical Dimensions
The United States supports the right of everyone to freedom of opinion
and expression, including freedom to hold opinions without interference
and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media
regardless of frontiers, as set forth in Article 19 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). We acknowledge that the exercise of
this right carries certain duties and responsibilities and that it may
be subject to certain restrictions, as provided by law in accordance
with Article 19 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR). As we noted in the declaration that we made when the
United States ratified the ICCPR, we believe that States Parties to the
ICCPR should, wherever possible, refrain from imposing restrictions on
the rights protected by the Covenant, including in particular the
restrictions provided for in Art. 19(3) of the ICCPR.
10) International and regional co-operation
Regional and international organizations have proven to be extremely
effective in facilitating policy formulation, infrastructure development
and capacity building - all toward the aim of building a knowledge-based
economy. The WSIS should recognize, and not call for duplication, of the
extensive body of work already underway in the global and regional
bodies. A global consensus has emerged with respect to the need to
create digital opportunities that allow all of the world's citizens to
fully realize the benefits that ICTs afford.
Conclusions
The United States views the current draft documents as an earnest
attempt to collate all of the input received via the preparatory
process. As the current documents are a reflection of many of the ideas
presented but not yet debated, the United States believes that it is
important for participants to carefully consider all views presented and
to seek to ensure that the final documents reflect only the points where
a truly global consensus was achieved.
The current drafts need to be pared back to enumerate the key concepts
and actions necessary to achieve sustainable development of the
information society. Specifically, the principles articulated should be
concise, clear and specific only to the degree appropriate for
high-level political endorsement. In addition, the final Declaration of
Principles and Action Plan adopted in Geneva in December 2003 should be
complementary in nature. The specific activities called for in the Plan
of Action should directly correlate with the issues articulated in the
Declaration of Principles. In this regard, detailed rationales for the
actions are unnecessary.
Taken in concert with the contributions from the various stakeholders,
the United States believes that the WSIS provides a unique opportunity
for the global community to reaffirm ongoing activities and efforts in
other fora that are contributing to WSIS objectives. We look forward to
working with colleagues throughout the WSIS process and we are confident
that a global consensus will emerge that appropriately addresses the
concerns of all stakeholders.
[end]
This site is managed by the Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an
endorsement of the views contained therein.
--
Manon Anne Ress
Consumer Project on Technology
www.cptech.org
PO Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036
manon.ress@cptech.org, voice: 1.202.387.8030, fax: 1.202.234.5176