[Dioxin-l] Good news, bad news
Joseph R Parrish Jr
JoeParrish@compuserve.com
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 19:05:37 -0500
David wrote:
"The references above find that dioxin TEQs now are lower than they were =
in
the 60's/ 70's."
After the end of Agent Orange production in Newark, NJ,
the dioxins dumped in Newark Bay began to decline, some =
little bit due to dechlorinating fungi, etc., but most due to =
the slow slide into the Atlantic and dissipation there--of =
course we may now be eating ocean fish that are =
more contaminated--I think that has been observed. Dioxin =
seems to get created quickly and removed from earth, etc., =
slowly--POP, Persistent Organic Pollutant, I think they call it. =
Net however, as long as we are not chemically producing =
dioxins in warfare quantities, I would agree that the world =
TEQs may be decreasing. What we are concerned around =
here about is that when dioxins become airborne, as is =
happening since the 1990-1994 building of all the huge =
incinerators around us, our bodies seem to be more =
saturated with them. The cancer death rates still exceed =
cardiovascular death rates in the samples we have =
observed, and seem to be accelerating since the first =
big burner went on line, as does endometriosis and =
sterility. One can drown in a river averaging one foot deep....
Joe, Ph.D., Biological Chemistry, Medical Sciences =