[Am-info] OT ...

[John J. Urbaniak]

Geoffrey wrote:

>
>> statement listing invasion and regime change.  No one sane starts a
>> war over a tantrum.  Now is the point you change your tune and say
>> the US doesn't need anyone's permission to attack anyone it sees fit.
>
>
> No, I said that just before.  Point is, the UN had resolutions 
> outlining what would be done, then would not follow through. 


Of course the UN wouldn't follow through.  Kofi Annan and his son, Kojo 
were taking bribes from Saddam.  So were the French, the Russians and 
Chinese, all with UN veto powers.

These low-life scum took food and medicine out of the mouths of needy 
Iraqi children to line their own pockets with *blood for oil* money.  
Then they promised Saddam they would veto any US resolution which ok-ed 
an invasion.

It's all in the "Oil for food" investigation.

And Kerry would subjugate US safety to these UN slime-molds?

John



>
>
> I won't do the research for you, I've done it for my own sake so as to 
> make an educated decision.  You would do well to do the same.  Have 
> you read ANY of the UN resolutions regarding Iraq?
>
>>> Start with Resolution 1441 and see for yourself.  I'll simply
>>> assume you're ignorant rather than foolish.
>>
>>
>> Not as ignorant as our president.  About his only economic savings
>> will be Mr. Bush's presidential library, which could be housed in a
>> shoe box.  I'm sure his buddies can easily afford that.
>
>
> Oh now that was relevant.  Ignore the facts and insult people, now 
> that's a sign of intelligence.
>
> I'll seriously not waste any more of my time discussing this with 
> someone who has not done any research and prefers to rant like a lunatic.
>