[Am-info] MS Source code
Mitch Stone
mitch@accidentalexpert.com
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:02:10 -0800
This article makes what looks to me to be some questionable assertions
about the significance of this leak. I suspect some serious technical
misunderstandings.
"Secondly, Microsoft's growth has come about because of its tight
control of its intellectual property - the source code of its products.
This has helped it maintain a stranglehold on the desktop computer
market. That hold has been demonstrably loosened now. Rivals could use
it to get a better idea of how Windows works and help them compete
against Microsoft."
How has their hold been "demonstrably loosened" by the release of the
code? How might it help rivals, exactly?
"Virus writers tend to be lazy and build on the efforts of others. Few
are likely to trawl through the millions of lines of code and go to the
trouble of working out where new vulnerabilities can be found. However,
it just takes one dedicated vandal to do the work and the tools will be
available to all"
If this is really a problem with (some) Windows source code being made
available, why isn't it a huge problem for Linux, with the entire
source available to hackers and everyone else? Or how about OSX, a
large portion of which is also open source?
On Feb 13, 2004, at 7:26 AM, Erick Andrews wrote:
> Another follow up on Mark's post on this topic, I just read this
> on the BBC and thought it was sad but hilarious.
>
> For the full spin, see:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3485545.stm
>
> ...
> Thirdly, it might be the last straw for people tired of the
> security headaches that Windows creates.
>
> Fourthly, for Microsoft to have this code paraded in public
> is hugely embarrassing. Not least because the code is
> littered with profanity and might show that many Microsoft
> programmers do not do a very good job.
>
> In the past independent programmers that have deconstructed
> other Microsoft applications have been shocked at what they
> found within the code. Rivals and critics will be able to
> see exactly how Microsoft staff do their work.
> ...
>
> Erick Andrews
>
> _______________________________________________
> Am-info mailing list
> Am-info@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/am-info
>
>
-----------
Mitch Stone
mitch@accidentalexpert.com
You can fool too many of the people
too much of the time.
-- James Thurber