[Am-info] More on the question of Microsft vs open source
Gene Gaines
gene.gaines@gainesgroup.com
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:01:01 -0500
A laugh. But not funny. Long, will take a while to read.
Please do not include my email address if you forward.
1. Email today from RSA Security Developer Solutions Group:
Subject: Last Chance to Register: Helping You Avoid the
Intellectual Property Litigation Trap
Are you considering or using an open source security solution
in your application development to save money? You should think
twice before moving forward. According to a survey published by
the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), the
median litigation costs for an intellectual property
infringement case can be almost $2 million (1). In addition to
the financial burden, significant time and resources must be
devoted to working on litigation of a patent or other
intellectual property infringement case.
You need to protect your company from possible financial
exposure and associated negative publicity from using either
commercial or open source security solutions not designed to
protect and insure your best interests.
Join representatives from Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP
and RSA Security for an informative discussion on how to help
protect your company from intellectual property lawsuits and
the benefits of using RSA BSAFE=AE security solutions.
In this free, one-hour seminar, you will learn:
=20
=B0 What the benefits of intellectual property indemnity are.
=20
=B0 What costs are associated with intellectual property
investigations, frivolous lawsuits, litigation and damages.
=20
=B0 Preventive measures to save your company from these costs,
negative press and loss of valuable resources.
=20
=B0 How commercial security software solutions from an
established vendor, like RSA BSAFE=AE products from RSA
Security, help provide a measure of protection against
infringing intellectual property rights.
If you are a product or business line manager, VP of
Engineering, CTO or developer, this seminar is for you!
Register now!
http://www.placewareforum.com/rsasecurity/page.cfm?p=3Devent&subcatid=3D=
11728&eventid=3D22289
After registering you will receive an e-mail confirmation with
instructions for accessing the online event. We hope you will
be able to join us on Wednesday, January 28th at this online
event!
=20
2. Who is Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP?
A quick search of their web site at www.hewm.com for "Microsoft":
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation - As pioneers of modern
antitrust law, Heller Ehrman attorneys draw on their experience
to defend big-name clients in some of the largest and most
significant antitrust matters pending in the United ...
- Consumer Litigation - Heller Ehrman has a long and successful
record defending clients in consumer litigation. Over the last
20 years, changes in the legal environment have led to a
sustained increase in the number and va...
The bios of five attorneys:
www.hewm.com/attorneys/attorneyBio.asp?attorneyID=3D339
This fellow's experience statement: Mr. Anderson has
substantial experience litigating complex disputes involving
Superfund, toxic torts, insurance coverage, takings and
claims arising under the state and federal Clean Water Acts.
He also has extensive recent experience in consumer class
actions involving computer software, insurance, and financial
institutions and with respect to scientific, technical and
economic expert witnesses in a variety of complex cases,
including environmental insurance coverage litigation.
Clients on insurance coverage matters have included Syntex,
ALCOA and Univar, and clients on consumer class action
matters include Microsoft, State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance company and Household Finance.
=20
www.hewm.com/attorneys/attorneyBio.asp?attorneyID=3D875
Her experience statement: Ms. Azcuenaga served as a
Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission for nearly 14
years. Her practice at the FTC included mergers and
acquisitions, the antitrust/intellectual property linkage,
advertising, administrative law and the law and economics of
regulatory advocacy. Before her appointment as a
Commissioner, she spent more than eleven years at the
Commission in positions including Assistant Director of the
San Francisco Regional Office and Assistant General Counsel
for Legal Counsel. She has litigated at the trial and
appellate level and has experience in every area of antitrust
and consumer protection.
=20
Ms. Azcuenaga represents clients in managing the antitrust
review of mergers and acquisitions under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. She also serves as a special
consultant to clients represented by other law firms in the
Hart-Scott-Rodino review and to those law firms. She defends
antitrust counterclaims in patent litigation for both
biotechnology and information technology clients. She has
assisted in representing Microsoft both in consumer class
actions and in the appeal of the antitrust case brought by
the government. Ms. Azcuenaga has represented Black & Decker
Corp. and others in FTC investigations and has assisted in
representing a client in a Department of Justice Bayh-Dole
Act investigation. She has served as a consultant and expert
witness in class action cases involving FTC-related issues.
She assists clients with the full range of antitrust and
trade regulation concerns.
Ms. Azcuenaga has authored numerous Federal Trade Commission
opinions and statements and several articles. She is a
frequent speaker at legal seminars, international conferences
and meetings of business, professional and consumer groups.
(Comment - Gaines: Enough. I won't bore you with any more.)
For completeness, three more attorneys were found on their web
site with the "Microsoft" search:
=20
www.hewm.com/attorneys/attorneyBio.asp?attorneyID=3D1108
www.hewm.com/attorneys/attorneyBio.asp?attorneyID=3D1242
www.hewm.com/attorneys/attorneyBio.asp?attorneyID=3D378
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation - Microsoft Corporation: We
represent Microsoft in numerous antitrust consumer class
actions initiated in the wake of the Department of Justice
litigation, as well as in antitrust litigat...
A casual search of their web site for "Microsoft":
- RSA Data Security, Inc. v. Cylink Corporation, C96-20094 SW
(N.D. Cal). The firm represented RSA in litigation involving
patent and license rights to public key and related encryption
software, technology that has become central to electronic
commerce over the Internet.
- RSA Data Security, Inc. v. Network Associates, Inc. and Pretty
Good Privacy, Inc., 97- 03755 MHP (N.D. Cal). The firm
represented RSA in this case involving public key encryption
technology.
I cannot help but wonder who is funding what I perceive as another
attack on open source?
Gene Gaines